linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: Add support for improved performance mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e2b73a2a-b1ef-9dc8-9924-f1ab2b1f5fd@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Nov 2023 16:24:46 +0200 (EET)
From:   Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@...ebb.ca>
cc:     "platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org" 
        <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        ibm-acpi-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        "Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@....com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: Add support for improved performance
 mode

On Mon, 13 Nov 2023, Mark Pearson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2023, at 7:37 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 Nov 2023, Mark Pearson wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 9, 2023, at 5:10 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 8 Nov 2023, Mark Pearson wrote:
> <snip>
> >> 
> >> >
> >> > Looking into the driver a bit more, there are a few other defines which 
> >> > could also move BIT() from the code into defines. Please tell if you're 
> >> > going to look at those because if not, I might try to make the patches.
> >> 
> >> Happy to look at doing that as I'm playing around with this driver anyway.
> >
> > Okay, thanks.
> >
> Just a quick note - I pushed v2 for this patch, and I'll tackle the 
> other BIT changes separately (rather than adding it as part of a 
> series). Looking through the code I wanted to spend more time on that 
> piece - I'm not ignoring it :) 

Yeah, no problem. I was expecting it separately anyway. :-)

-- 
 i.