[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231113172106.GA12501@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 18:21:06 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat@...cle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 04/10] perf: Introduce deferred user callchains
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 08:56:39AM -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Ok, then BPF gets no user call stacks even with sframes.
Well, you could obviously run another BPF program at return to user and
stitch there.
> Ok, but ...
> If the task is preempted, the call stack would be from another
> task (if it also has the pending call stacks) and we need to
> check which user call stack matches which kernel call stack.
> So there's no guarantee we can just use adjacent samples.
So upon requesting a user backtrace for the task it could request a
token (from eg a global atomic u64 in the most crude case) and place
this in the task_struct. The backtrace will emit this as forward
reference for the user trace.
Once the task_work generates the user stacktrace, it will again dump
this token along with the user unwind, after which it will reset the
token for this this task (to 0).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists