[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZVJrTEDRzjIfL7kq@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 18:30:36 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
"Yin, Fengwei" <fengwei.yin@...el.com>,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Rohan Puri <rohan.puri15@...il.com>,
Mcgrof Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Adam Manzanares <a.manzanares@...sung.com>,
"Vishal Moola (Oracle)" <vishal.moola@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] mm/compaction: enable compacting >0 order folios.
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 12:01:54PM -0500, Zi Yan wrote:
> + /* this makes migrate_pages() split the source page and retry */
> + if (folio_order(src) > 0)
> + return NULL;
Nit: folio_test_large() is more efficient than folio_order() > 0.
The former simply tests the bit, while the second tests the bit, then
loads folio->_order to check it's >0. We know it will be, but there's
no way to tell gcc that if the bit is set, this value is definitely not 0.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists