linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v3 12/12] selftests: add ncdevmem, netcat for devmem TCP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231113172020.728cdf6a@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 13 Nov 2023 17:20:20 -0500
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@...gle.com>,
        Praveen Kaligineedi <pkaligineedi@...gle.com>,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 12/12] selftests: add ncdevmem, netcat for devmem
 TCP

On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 20:08:10 -0800 Mina Almasry wrote:
> 1. For (b), would it be OK to implement a very minimal version of
> queue_[stop|start]/queue_mem_[alloc|free], which I use for the sole
> purpose of reposting buffers to an individual queue, and then later
> whoever picks up your queue API effort (maybe me) extends the
> implementation to do the rest of the things you described in your
> email? If not, what is the minimal queue API I can implement and use
> for devmem TCP?

Any form of queue API is better than a temporary ndo.
IIUC it will not bubble up into uAPI in any way so we can extend/change
it later as needed.

> 2. Since this is adding ndo, do I need to implement the ndo for 2
> drivers or is GVE sufficient?

One driver is fine, especially if we're doing this instead of the reset
hack.