[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ca0eb68d-e9cb-4d07-a592-b9bb2d3f033c@vivo.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 11:09:47 +0800
From: zhiguojiang <justinjiang@...o.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
opensource.kernel@...o.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mm: ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC flag allocation issue
在 2023/11/13 9:36, Matthew Wilcox 写道:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 09:04:49AM +0800, zhiguojiang wrote:
>>
>> 在 2023/11/11 14:25, Matthew Wilcox 写道:
>>> On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 09:49:54AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:31:33 +0800 Zhiguo Jiang <justinjiang@...o.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Add a new bool* argument to pass return flag instead of *alloc_flags
>>>>> and add the related comments.
>>>> Please retain (and update) the changelog with each version of a patch.
>>>>
>>>> For reviewers (please), here's the v1 changelog:
>>> This patch isn't diffed against the current tree. It can't be reviewed.
>> patch v1:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231108065408.1861-1-justinjiang@vivo.com/
>> patch v2:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231109073133.792-2-justinjiang@vivo.com/
>> patch v3:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231110020840.1031-1-justinjiang@vivo.com/
> None of those are diffed against the current tree. You need to send a
> patch that applies cleanly to either linux-next or current Linus head.
> Not a patch on top of an earlier version of your patch.
Modification has been made based on today's latest patch from
linux-next, thanks.
Patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231113030343.1984-1-justinjiang@vivo.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists