[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231114225833.1691370-1-ronan@rjp.ie>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 15:56:25 -0700
From: Ronan Pigott <ronan@....ie>
To: peterz@...radead.org
Cc: Ronan Pigott <ronan@....ie>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list:SCHEDULER)
Subject: [PATCH] sched/debug: re-align header in sched/debug debugfs output
New fields were introduced with EEVDF, so we should adjust the table
header to match. Additionally, the sum_exec_runtime field was
duplicated, so one was removed.
Fixes: 147f3efaa241 ("sched/fair: Implement an EEVDF-like scheduling policy")
Signed-off-by: Ronan Pigott <ronan@....ie>
---
I decided to put each title section on its own line to match printf
invocation above, and to make it a little easier to see the intended
field width. I hope the kernel can suffer a few extra source lines for
this convenience.
kernel/sched/debug.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
index 4580a450700e..8d9f8f402059 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
@@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ print_task(struct seq_file *m, struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
else
SEQ_printf(m, " %c", task_state_to_char(p));
- SEQ_printf(m, "%15s %5d %9Ld.%06ld %c %9Ld.%06ld %9Ld.%06ld %9Ld.%06ld %9Ld %5d ",
+ SEQ_printf(m, " %15s %5d %9Ld.%06ld %c %9Ld.%06ld %9Ld.%06ld %9Ld.%06ld %9Ld %5d ",
p->comm, task_pid_nr(p),
SPLIT_NS(p->se.vruntime),
entity_eligible(cfs_rq_of(&p->se), &p->se) ? 'E' : 'N',
@@ -589,14 +589,13 @@ print_task(struct seq_file *m, struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
(long long)(p->nvcsw + p->nivcsw),
p->prio);
- SEQ_printf(m, "%9lld.%06ld %9lld.%06ld %9lld.%06ld %9lld.%06ld",
+ SEQ_printf(m, "%9lld.%06ld %9lld.%06ld %9lld.%06ld",
SPLIT_NS(schedstat_val_or_zero(p->stats.wait_sum)),
- SPLIT_NS(p->se.sum_exec_runtime),
SPLIT_NS(schedstat_val_or_zero(p->stats.sum_sleep_runtime)),
SPLIT_NS(schedstat_val_or_zero(p->stats.sum_block_runtime)));
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
- SEQ_printf(m, " %d %d", task_node(p), task_numa_group_id(p));
+ SEQ_printf(m, " %5d %5d", task_node(p), task_numa_group_id(p));
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED
SEQ_printf_task_group_path(m, task_group(p), " %s")
@@ -611,10 +610,37 @@ static void print_rq(struct seq_file *m, struct rq *rq, int rq_cpu)
SEQ_printf(m, "\n");
SEQ_printf(m, "runnable tasks:\n");
- SEQ_printf(m, " S task PID tree-key switches prio"
- " wait-time sum-exec sum-sleep\n");
- SEQ_printf(m, "-------------------------------------------------------"
- "------------------------------------------------------\n");
+ SEQ_printf(m, " S"
+ " task"
+ " PID"
+ " tree-key"
+ " E"
+ " deadline"
+ " slice"
+ " sum-exec"
+ " switches"
+ " prio"
+ " wait-time"
+ " sum-sleep"
+ " sum-block"
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
+ " node id"
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED
+ " task-group"
+#endif
+ "\n"
+ );
+ SEQ_printf(m, "--------------------------------------------------------"
+ "--------------------------------------------------------------"
+ "-------------------------------------------"
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
+ "------------"
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED
+ "-----------"
+#endif
+ "\n");
rcu_read_lock();
for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
--
2.42.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists