[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM4PR12MB6351C6DB983ED720A273526BF7B2A@DM4PR12MB6351.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 01:21:20 +0000
From: "Meng, Li (Jassmine)" <Li.Meng@....com>
To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"Huang, Ray" <Ray.Huang@....com>
CC: "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"Fontenot, Nathan" <Nathan.Fontenot@....com>,
"Sharma, Deepak" <Deepak.Sharma@....com>,
"Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>,
"Limonciello, Mario" <Mario.Limonciello@....com>,
"Huang, Shimmer" <Shimmer.Huang@....com>,
"Yuan, Perry" <Perry.Yuan@....com>,
"Du, Xiaojian" <Xiaojian.Du@....com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V10 0/7] amd-pstate preferred core
[AMD Official Use Only - General]
Hi all:
Do you have any other review comments?
Hi Rafael:
If there are no other issues, can you merge it to linux-next?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Meng, Li (Jassmine) <Li.Meng@....com>
> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2023 2:34 PM
> To: Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>; Huang, Ray
> <Ray.Huang@....com>
> Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> x86@...nel.org; linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org; Shuah Khan
> <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>; linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org; Fontenot,
> Nathan <Nathan.Fontenot@....com>; Sharma, Deepak
> <Deepak.Sharma@....com>; Deucher, Alexander
> <Alexander.Deucher@....com>; Limonciello, Mario
> <Mario.Limonciello@....com>; Huang, Shimmer
> <Shimmer.Huang@....com>; Yuan, Perry <Perry.Yuan@....com>; Du,
> Xiaojian <Xiaojian.Du@....com>; Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>;
> Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>; Oleksandr Natalenko
> <oleksandr@...alenko.name>; Meng, Li (Jassmine) <Li.Meng@....com>
> Subject: [PATCH V10 0/7] amd-pstate preferred core
>
> Hi all:
>
> The core frequency is subjected to the process variation in semiconductors.
> Not all cores are able to reach the maximum frequency respecting the
> infrastructure limits. Consequently, AMD has redefined the concept of
> maximum frequency of a part. This means that a fraction of cores can reach
> maximum frequency. To find the best process scheduling policy for a given
> scenario, OS needs to know the core ordering informed by the platform
> through highest performance capability register of the CPPC interface.
>
> Earlier implementations of amd-pstate preferred core only support a static
> core ranking and targeted performance. Now it has the ability to dynamically
> change the preferred core based on the workload and platform conditions
> and accounting for thermals and aging.
>
> Amd-pstate driver utilizes the functions and data structures provided by the
> ITMT architecture to enable the scheduler to favor scheduling on cores which
> can be get a higher frequency with lower voltage.
> We call it amd-pstate preferred core.
>
> Here sched_set_itmt_core_prio() is called to set priorities and
> sched_set_itmt_support() is called to enable ITMT feature.
> Amd-pstate driver uses the highest performance value to indicate the
> priority of CPU. The higher value has a higher priority.
>
> Amd-pstate driver will provide an initial core ordering at boot time.
> It relies on the CPPC interface to communicate the core ranking to the
> operating system and scheduler to make sure that OS is choosing the cores
> with highest performance firstly for scheduling the process. When amd-
> pstate driver receives a message with the highest performance change, it will
> update the core ranking.
>
> Changes from V9->V10:
> - cpufreq: amd-pstate:
> - - add judgement for highest_perf. When it is less than 255, the
> preferred core feature is enabled. And it will set the priority.
> - - deleset "static u32 max_highest_perf" etc, because amd p-state
> perferred coe does not require specail process for hotpulg.
>
> Changes form V8->V9:
> - all:
> - - pick up Tested-By flag added by Oleksandr.
> - cpufreq: amd-pstate:
> - - pick up Review-By flag added by Wyes.
> - - ignore modification of bug.
> - - add a attribute of prefcore_ranking.
> - - modify data type conversion from u32 to int.
> - Documentation: amd-pstate:
> - - pick up Review-By flag added by Wyes.
>
> Changes form V7->V8:
> - all:
> - - pick up Review-By flag added by Mario and Ray.
> - cpufreq: amd-pstate:
> - - use hw_prefcore embeds into cpudata structure.
> - - delete preferred core init from cpu online/off.
>
> Changes form V6->V7:
> - x86:
> - - Modify kconfig about X86_AMD_PSTATE.
> - cpufreq: amd-pstate:
> - - modify incorrect comments about scheduler_work().
> - - convert highest_perf data type.
> - - modify preferred core init when cpu init and online.
> - acpi: cppc:
> - - modify link of CPPC highest performance.
> - cpufreq:
> - - modify link of CPPC highest performance changed.
>
> Changes form V5->V6:
> - cpufreq: amd-pstate:
> - - modify the wrong tag order.
> - - modify warning about hw_prefcore sysfs attribute.
> - - delete duplicate comments.
> - - modify the variable name cppc_highest_perf to prefcore_ranking.
> - - modify judgment conditions for setting highest_perf.
> - - modify sysfs attribute for CPPC highest perf to pr_debug message.
> - Documentation: amd-pstate:
> - - modify warning: title underline too short.
>
> Changes form V4->V5:
> - cpufreq: amd-pstate:
> - - modify sysfs attribute for CPPC highest perf.
> - - modify warning about comments
> - - rebase linux-next
> - cpufreq:
> - - Moidfy warning about function declarations.
> - Documentation: amd-pstate:
> - - align with ``amd-pstat``
>
> Changes form V3->V4:
> - Documentation: amd-pstate:
> - - Modify inappropriate descriptions.
>
> Changes form V2->V3:
> - x86:
> - - Modify kconfig and description.
> - cpufreq: amd-pstate:
> - - Add Co-developed-by tag in commit message.
> - cpufreq:
> - - Modify commit message.
> - Documentation: amd-pstate:
> - - Modify inappropriate descriptions.
>
> Changes form V1->V2:
> - acpi: cppc:
> - - Add reference link.
> - cpufreq:
> - - Moidfy link error.
> - cpufreq: amd-pstate:
> - - Init the priorities of all online CPUs
> - - Use a single variable to represent the status of preferred core.
> - Documentation:
> - - Default enabled preferred core.
> - Documentation: amd-pstate:
> - - Modify inappropriate descriptions.
> - - Default enabled preferred core.
> - - Use a single variable to represent the status of preferred core.
>
> Meng Li (7):
> x86: Drop CPU_SUP_INTEL from SCHED_MC_PRIO for the expansion.
> acpi: cppc: Add get the highest performance cppc control
> cpufreq: amd-pstate: Enable amd-pstate preferred core supporting.
> cpufreq: Add a notification message that the highest perf has changed
> cpufreq: amd-pstate: Update amd-pstate preferred core ranking
> dynamically
> Documentation: amd-pstate: introduce amd-pstate preferred core
> Documentation: introduce amd-pstate preferrd core mode kernel
> command
> line options
>
> .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 5 +
> Documentation/admin-guide/pm/amd-pstate.rst | 59 +++++-
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 5 +-
> drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 13 ++
> drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c | 6 +
> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 187 ++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 13 ++
> include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 5 +
> include/linux/amd-pstate.h | 10 +
> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 5 +
> 10 files changed, 288 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists