[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231114124748.581850-2-mubin.sayyed@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 18:17:46 +0530
From: Mubin Sayyed <mubin.sayyed@....com>
To: <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, <michal.simek@....com>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>, <git@....com>, <mubin10@...il.com>,
Mubin Sayyed <mubin.sayyed@....com>
Subject: [LINUX PATCH v2 1/3] clocksource: timer-cadence-ttc: Do not probe TTC device configured as PWM
TTC device can act either as clocksource/clockevent or
PWM generator, it would be decided by pwm-cells property.
TTC PWM feature would be supported through separate driver
based on PWM framework.
If pwm-cells property is present in TTC node, it would be
treated as PWM device, and clocksource driver should just
skip it.
Signed-off-by: Mubin Sayyed <mubin.sayyed@....com>
---
Changes for v2:
- Added comment regarding pwm-cells property
---
drivers/clocksource/timer-cadence-ttc.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-cadence-ttc.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-cadence-ttc.c
index 32daaac9b132..f8fcb1a4bdd0 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-cadence-ttc.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-cadence-ttc.c
@@ -477,6 +477,13 @@ static int __init ttc_timer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
u32 timer_width = 16;
struct device_node *timer = pdev->dev.of_node;
+ /*
+ * If pwm-cells property is present in TTC node,
+ * it would be treated as PWM device.
+ */
+ if (of_property_read_bool(timer, "#pwm-cells"))
+ return -ENODEV;
+
if (initialized)
return 0;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists