linux-kernel - linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231114131335.3aba4f4d@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Tue, 14 Nov 2023 13:13:35 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

Hi all,

After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:

drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sm8650-lpass-lpi.c:232:10: error: 'const struct lpi_pinctrl_variant_data' has no member named 'flags'
  232 |         .flags = LPI_FLAG_SLEW_RATE_SAME_REG,
      |          ^~~~~
drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sm8650-lpass-lpi.c:232:18: error: 'LPI_FLAG_SLEW_RATE_SAME_REG' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'LPI_SLEW_RATE_CTL_REG'?
  232 |         .flags = LPI_FLAG_SLEW_RATE_SAME_REG,
      |                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                  LPI_SLEW_RATE_CTL_REG
drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sm8650-lpass-lpi.c:232:18: error: excess elements in struct initializer [-Werror]
drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sm8650-lpass-lpi.c:232:18: note: (near initialization for 'sm8650_lpi_data')
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

Caused by commit

  c4e47673853f ("pinctrl: qcom: sm8650-lpass-lpi: add SM8650 LPASS")

I have used the pinctrl tree from next-20231113 for today.



-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped