[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1jleb0bhvb.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 14:07:16 +0100
From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@...ogic.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
Chuan Liu <chuan.liu@...ogic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 0/4] Add C3 SoC PLLs and Peripheral clock
On Fri 10 Nov 2023 at 18:50, Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com> wrote:
> On Fri 10 Nov 2023 at 14:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
>> On 06/11/2023 09:55, Xianwei Zhao wrote:
>>> The patchset adds support for the peripheral and PLL clock controller
>>> found on the Amlogic C3 SoC family, such as C302X or C308L.
>>>
>>> Changes since V5 [3]:
>>> - Fix some typo and modify formart for MARCO. Suggested by Jerome.
>>> - Add pad clock for peripheral input clock in bindings.
>>> - Add some description for explaining why ddr_dpll_pt_clk and cts_msr_clk are out of tree.
>>> Changes since V4 [10]:
>>> - Change some fw_name of clocks. Suggested by Jerome.
>>> - Delete minItem of clocks.
>>> - Add CLk_GET_RATE_NOCACHE flags for gp1_pll
>>> - Fix some format. and fix width as 8 for mclk_pll_dco.
>>> - exchange gate and divder for fclk_50m clock.
>>> - add CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT for axi_a_divder & axi_b_divder.
>>> - add CLK_IS_CRITICAL for axi_clk
>>> - Optimized macro define for pwm clk.
>>> - add cts_oscin_clk mux between 24M and 32k
>>> - add some missing gate clock, such as ddr_pll.
>>
>> Where are all these versions? Please provide links.
>
> I have provided some guidance offline at the request of Amlogic.
>
> This should have been v4 and the cover-letter should have summarized the
> change from v3 to this. Unfortunately it was sent as v6 :/
>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
While labeling this v6 was a mistake, please continue from there:
next to be v7. Don't reset to v4 or v5. If more versions are needed, I
don't want to end up with 2 v6 on the list, that would be even more
confusing.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists