[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZVN0bNduYm7UHP3s@black.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 15:21:48 +0200
From: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, brgl@...ev.pl,
mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@...el.com, bala.senthil@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Use the standard _PM_OPS() export macro in Intel
Tangier GPIO driver
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 01:49:08PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 06:38:44AM +0200, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 05:58:34PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 06:45:57PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > > > This series exports pm_ops structure from Intel Tangier GPIO driver using
> > > > EXPORT_NS_GPL_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() helper and reuses it into its users.
> > >
> > > Yet you missed --base...
> >
> > My understanding is that we use --base only for the patches with explicit
> > in-tree dependency, which this series doesn't have any AFAIK.
> >
> > Will start using it for every patch if it makes everyone happy :)
>
> For single patches it's not so critical, only for the series as I'm using b4
> to treat them as PRs, so cover letter goes to the merge commit and b4 tries
> to guess the base (often wrongly).
Understood, will take care from now on.
Raag
Powered by blists - more mailing lists