linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] lib/vsprintf: Fix %pfwf when current node refcount == 0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZVN1z5zuCRhVQ2Kw@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Nov 2023 15:27:43 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@...rochip.com>,
        Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
        Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@...rochip.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] lib/vsprintf: Fix %pfwf when current node refcount
 == 0

On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 02:19:34PM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 15:12:47 +0200
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 12:04:56PM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
> > > A refcount issue can appeared in __fwnode_link_del() due to the
> > > pr_debug() call:  

---8<---

> > >   WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 901 at lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0xe5/0x110
> > >   Call Trace:

> > >   ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xe5/0x110

	...
> > >   of_node_get+0x1e/0x30
> > >   of_fwnode_get+0x28/0x40
> > >   fwnode_full_name_string+0x34/0x90
> > >   fwnode_string+0xdb/0x140
	...

> > >   vsnprintf+0x17b/0x630
	...
> > >   __fwnode_link_del+0x25/0xa0
> > >   fwnode_links_purge+0x39/0xb0
> > >   of_node_release+0xd9/0x180
	...

---8<---

> > Please, do not put so many unrelated lines of backtrace in the commit message.
> > Leave only the important ones (the Submitting Patches document suggests some
> > like ~3-5 lines only).
> 
> Ok, I will remove some of them.

Thanks (my suggestion is above).

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko