[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231114134427.GB1645963-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 07:44:27 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>, John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Alexander Couzens <lynxis@...0.eu>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: phy: mediatek,xfi-pextp: add new
bindings
On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 11:11:02PM +0000, Daniel Golle wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 10:55:55PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > + mediatek,usxgmii-performance-errata:
> > > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
> > > + description:
> > > + USXGMII0 on MT7988 suffers from a performance problem in 10GBase-R
> > > + mode which needs a work-around in the driver. The work-around is
> > > + enabled using this flag.
> >
> > Is there more details about this? I'm just wondering if this should be
> > based on the compatible, rather than a bool property.
>
> The vendor sources where this is coming from are here:
>
> https://git01.mediatek.com/plugins/gitiles/openwrt/feeds/mtk-openwrt-feeds/+/a500d94cd47e279015ce22947e1ce396a7516598%5E%21/#F0
>
> And I'm afraid this is as much detail as it gets. And yes, we could
> also base this on the compatible and just have two different ones for
> the two PEXTP instances found in MT7988.
> Let me know your conclusion in that regard.
I'd go with a property in this case unless you think there may be other
per instance differences.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists