[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8e3a25c3-e355-47d4-a9ce-d38e8a9375d4@epam.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 13:45:02 +0000
From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <Oleksandr_Tyshchenko@...m.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] xen/events: modify internal [un]bind interfaces
On 16.10.23 09:28, Juergen Gross wrote:
Hello Juergen
> Modify the internal bind- and unbind-interfaces to take a struct
> irq_info parameter. When allocating a new IRQ pass the pointer from
> the allocating function further up.
>
> This will reduce the number of info_for_irq() calls and make the code
> more efficient.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
I didn't spot obvious issues with current patch, other than just the
fact that patch needs rebasing (some hunks cannot be applied because of
"e64e7c74b99e xen/events: avoid using info_for_irq() in
xen_send_IPI_one()" went in).
I was going to ask why "pirq_query_unmask()/pirq_from_irq()" wasn't
converted to take a struct irq_info parameter as well, but looking at
the rest I noticed this was already done in subsequent commit.
With proper rebasing:
Reviewed-by: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@...m.com>
[snip]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists