| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAAhV-H6PfKc7+p3iFpDF=Hv45b+2ouCOWZ0w-tHxRauprtbaYA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 10:25:40 +0800
From: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
kernel@...0n.name, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@...amperecomputing.com>
Subject: Re: drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: sparse:
incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
Hi, Robin,
Could you please try this patch?
https://lore.kernel.org/loongarch/20231113032511.860159-1-chenhuacai@loongson.cn/T/#u
Huacai
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 11:45 PM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com> wrote:
>
> On 2023-11-12 1:38 am, kernel test robot wrote:
> > Hi Robin,
> >
> > First bad commit (maybe != root cause):
> >
> > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> > head: 3ca112b71f35dd5d99fc4571a56b5fc6f0c15814
> > commit: f9bd34e3753ea8f1433a3ba70f03a165a1416f98 perf/arm_cspmu: Clean up ACPI dependency
> > date: 5 months ago
> > config: loongarch-randconfig-r133-20231107 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231112/202311120926.cjYHyoYw-lkp@intel.com/config)
> > compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
> > reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231112/202311120926.cjYHyoYw-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> >
> > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311120926.cjYHyoYw-lkp@intel.com/
> >
> > sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
> >>> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void *ptr @@ got unsigned int [noderef] __percpu * @@
> > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: expected void *ptr
> > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: got unsigned int [noderef] __percpu *
>
> Unpicking the macros, I guess this must stem from:
>
> for_each_sibling_event()
> -> lockdep_assert_event_ctx()
> ->this_cpu_read(hardirqs_enabled)
>
> which appears to be the only obvious place to involve a __percpu pointer
> in this area.
>
> From there it would seem to be a preexisting Loongarch bug - AFAICS
> __percpu_read() (and presumably at least __percpu_write() as well)
> should not be expecting a raw void * argument, but still the __percpu
> pointer, since the final dereference is done right down in the asm using
> the per-cpu offset stashed in r21?
>
> Thanks,
> Robin.
>
> >>> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void *ptr @@ got unsigned int [noderef] __percpu * @@
> > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: expected void *ptr
> > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: got unsigned int [noderef] __percpu *
> >>> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void *ptr @@ got unsigned int [noderef] __percpu * @@
> > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: expected void *ptr
> > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: got unsigned int [noderef] __percpu *
> >>> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void *ptr @@ got unsigned int [noderef] __percpu * @@
> > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: expected void *ptr
> > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: got unsigned int [noderef] __percpu *
> >>> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void *ptr @@ got int [noderef] __percpu * @@
> > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: expected void *ptr
> > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: got int [noderef] __percpu *
> >>> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void *ptr @@ got int [noderef] __percpu * @@
> > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: expected void *ptr
> > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: got int [noderef] __percpu *
> >>> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void *ptr @@ got int [noderef] __percpu * @@
> > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: expected void *ptr
> > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: got int [noderef] __percpu *
> >>> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void *ptr @@ got int [noderef] __percpu * @@
> > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: expected void *ptr
> > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: got int [noderef] __percpu *
> >
> > vim +627 drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> >
> > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 609
> > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 610 /*
> > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 611 * Make sure the group of events can be scheduled at once
> > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 612 * on the PMU.
> > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 613 */
> > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 614 static bool arm_cspmu_validate_group(struct perf_event *event)
> > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 615 {
> > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 616 struct perf_event *sibling, *leader = event->group_leader;
> > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 617 struct arm_cspmu_hw_events fake_hw_events;
> > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 618
> > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 619 if (event->group_leader == event)
> > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 620 return true;
> > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 621
> > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 622 memset(&fake_hw_events, 0, sizeof(fake_hw_events));
> > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 623
> > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 624 if (!arm_cspmu_validate_event(event->pmu, &fake_hw_events, leader))
> > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 625 return false;
> > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 626
> > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 @627 for_each_sibling_event(sibling, leader) {
> > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 628 if (!arm_cspmu_validate_event(event->pmu, &fake_hw_events,
> > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 629 sibling))
> > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 630 return false;
> > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 631 }
> > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 632
> > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 633 return arm_cspmu_validate_event(event->pmu, &fake_hw_events, event);
> > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 634 }
> > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 635
> >
> > :::::: The code at line 627 was first introduced by commit
> > :::::: e37dfd65731dc4f001fa7dfa7f705e6840017d5a perf: arm_cspmu: Add support for ARM CoreSight PMU driver
> >
> > :::::: TO: Besar Wicaksono <bwicaksono@...dia.com>
> > :::::: CC: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists