[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231114-abnormal-uncross-dcebea2e82ae@squawk>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 17:51:41 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Mehdi Djait <mehdi.djait@...tlin.com>, mchehab@...nel.org,
heiko@...ech.de, hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com, michael.riesch@...fvision.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/3] media: dt-bindings: media: add bindings for
Rockchip CIF
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 05:54:08PM +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > Ultimately, I don't care what the file ends up being called when there
> > are multiple devices documented in it. I'd ack a patch renaming to the
> > œriginal incarnation of the IP when the documentation for that IP is
> > added without a second thought.
>
> That would be agreeable to me if my proposal still ends up feeling unreasonable
> to you. But I might very well take you at your word since I ended up purchasing
> a RK3066 board in a moment of weakness last week.
The ideal outcome I suppose would be documenting both variants. If
you've gone ahead and bought one, give that a go.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists