[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6c9510b0-f9a1-4d18-b4fb-277bc8566cc1@t-8ch.de>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 19:48:42 +0100
From: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@...ch.de>
To: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...pp.de>
Cc: avri.altman@....com, bvanassche@....org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
stanley.chu@...iatek.com, mani@...nel.org, quic_cang@...cinc.com,
quic_asutoshd@...cinc.com, beanhuo@...ron.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mikebi@...ron.com, lporzio@...ron.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] scsi: ufs: core: Add sysfs node for UFS RTC update
On 2023-11-14 19:39:55+0100, Bean Huo wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-11-09 at 15:05 +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > > + schedule_delayed_work(&hba->ufs_rtc_delayed_work,
> > > + msecs_to_jiffies(hb
> > > a->dev_info.rtc_update_period));
> >
> > What about the other work that has already been scheduled?
>
> I don't quite understand your concern here, I need to schedule the
> work when needed because of resume_period_update.
>
> Work may have been scheduled, but that's okay, there will be one more
> RTC update as expected.
If it's fine to have this additional update, all is good.
Thomas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists