linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Don't unnecessarily force masterclock update on vCPU hotplug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Nov 2023 11:39:39 -0800
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To:     Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@...cle.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Don't unnecessarily force masterclock update on
 vCPU hotplug

On Tue, Nov 14, 2023, Dongli Zhang wrote:
> Hi Sean,
> 
> Would mind sharing if the patch is waiting for Reviewed-by, and when it will be
> merged into kvm-x86 tree?

I'm at LPC this week, and out next week, so nothing is going to get applied to
kvm-x86 until after -rc3.  I considered trying to squeeze in a few things this
week, but decided to just wait until -rc3 and not rush anything, as the timing
doesn't really matter in the end.

> While I not sure if the same developer can give both Tested-by and Reviewed-by ...
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@...cle.com>

Thanks!  Providing both a Reviewed-by and Tested-by is totally valid.