linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] of: Introduce hardware prober driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=X-17COQ2-tycV1bSuCrGy7MJ88Un8nA-a-ODexvgi9TQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Nov 2023 12:44:25 -0800
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        linus.walleij@...aro.org, broonie@...nel.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, hdegoede@...hat.com,
        james.clark@....com, james@...iv.tech, keescook@...omium.org,
        petr.tesarik.ext@...wei.com, rafael@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        Jeff LaBundy <jeff@...undy.com>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] of: Introduce hardware prober driver

Hi,

On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 2:28 PM Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > So if we're searching the whole device tree for "failed-needs-probe"
> > then we need to figure out which devices are related to each other. If
> > a given board has second sources for MIPI panels, touchscreens, and
> > trackpads then we need to know which of the "failed-needs-probe"
> > devices are trackpads, which are touchscreens, and which are MIPI
> > panels. Do you have any suggestions for how we should do that? Maybe
> > it was in some other thread that I missed? I guess we could have a
> > board-specific table mapping (compatible + node name + reg) to a
> > class, but that feels awkward.
>
> Node name is supposed to correspond to device class, so why not use
> that (no path or unit-address.) and nothing else (well, besides
> "status")?

One problem is that I could imagine having two second source trackpads
that both have the same i2c address. That would give them the same
name, right? I guess you could maybe come up with some sort of suffix
rule? Like

trackpad-1@10 {
  compatible = "elan,blah";
  ret = <0x10>;
  status = "failed-needs-probe";
  ...
}
trackpad-2@10 {
  compatible = "goodix,gt7375p";
  ret = <0x10>;
  status = "failed-needs-probe";
  ...
}

Then I guess the class would be "trackpad"?


-Doug