[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y1ezzivn.fsf@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 10:57:08 +0530
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"ndesaulniers@...gle.com" <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rohan McLure <rmclure@...ux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] powerpc/smp: Enable Asym packing for cores on
shared processor
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> If there are shared processor LPARs, underlying Hypervisor can have more
> virtual cores to handle than actual physical cores.
>
> Starting with Power 9, a big core (aka SMT8 core) has 2 nearly
> independent thread groups. On a shared processors LPARs, it helps to
> pack threads to lesser number of cores so that the overall system
> performance and utilization improves. PowerVM schedules at a big core
> level. Hence packing to fewer cores helps.
>
> For example: Lets says there are two 8-core Shared LPARs that are
> actually sharing a 8 Core shared physical pool, each running 8 threads
> each. Then Consolidating 8 threads to 4 cores on each LPAR would help
> them to perform better. This is because each of the LPAR will get
> 100% time to run applications and there will no switching required by
> the Hypervisor.
>
Will this patch consolidate things to first 8 threads or just the one
Big core? /me continues to look at other patches and wonder whether 4/5
should come before this?
>
> To achieve this, enable SD_ASYM_PACKING flag at CACHE, MC and DIE level
> when the system is running in shared processor mode and has big cores.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
-aneesh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists