linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 3/8] memory-provider: dmabuf devmem memory provider

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6f5b2c30-8336-4e03-9239-be2be736a09f@amd.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Nov 2023 07:46:56 +0100
From:   Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
        Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
Cc:     Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
        pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        Kaiyuan Zhang <kaiyuanz@...gle.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/8] memory-provider: dmabuf devmem memory provider

Am 14.11.23 um 14:16 schrieb Jason Gunthorpe:
> A non-mm owned struct page should not be
> passed into mm calls. It is just way too hacky to be seriously
> considered :(

Can we please print this sentence on T-Shirts? Or framed on the wall of 
meeting rooms?

I don't know how often I had to repeat that to people.

Regards,
Christian.