| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <dba223a1-0456-40b8-b295-ea960867dcf9@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 15:21:40 +0530
From: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC: <will@...nel.org>, <robin.murphy@....com>, <joro@...tes.org>,
<a39.skl@...il.com>, <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
<quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com>, <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <qipl.kernel.upstream@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] iommu/arm-smmu: add ACTLR data and support for
SM8550
On 11/15/2023 3:08 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 11:22, Bibek Kumar Patro
> <quic_bibekkum@...cinc.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/14/2023 7:42 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 at 15:57, Bibek Kumar Patro
>>> <quic_bibekkum@...cinc.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Add ACTLR data table for SM8550 along with support for
>>>> same including SM8550 specific implementation operations.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@...cinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 88 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>>>> index 578c662c7c30..0eaf6f2a2e49 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>>>> @@ -25,6 +25,70 @@ struct actlr_data {
>>>> u32 actlr;
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> +#define PRE_FETCH_1 0
>>>> +#define PRE_FETCH_2 BIT(8)
>>>> +#define PRE_FETCH_3 (BIT(9) | BIT(8))
>>>
>>> What is the difference between PRE_FETCH_3 and PRE_FETCH_2? And
>>> PRE_FETCH_1? Are these real numbers that refer to some amount / count
>>> or just dummy names?
>>>
>>
>> No,these are not real numbers, but prefetch settings for a particular
>> perfect configuration.
>
> Then I'd ask for some better names or descriptions.
>
Noted, PREFETCH_SETTING_n / PREFETCH_OPTION_n sounds like a better name
in the following case. Would it be okay to use this name instead?
>>
>>>> +#define CPRE BIT(1) /* Enable context caching in the prefetch buffer */
>>>> +#define CMTLB BIT(0) /* Enable context caching in the macro TLB */
>>>> +
>>>> +static const struct actlr_data sm8550_apps_actlr_data[] = {
>>>> + { 0x18a0, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_2 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x18e0, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_2 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x0800, 0x0020, PRE_FETCH_1 | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x1800, 0x00c0, PRE_FETCH_1 | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x1820, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_1 | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x1860, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_1 | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x0c01, 0x0020, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x0c02, 0x0020, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x0c03, 0x0020, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x0c04, 0x0020, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x0c05, 0x0020, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x0c06, 0x0020, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x0c07, 0x0020, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x0c08, 0x0020, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x0c09, 0x0020, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x0c0c, 0x0020, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x0c0d, 0x0020, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x0c0e, 0x0020, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x0c0f, 0x0020, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x1961, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x1962, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x1963, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x1964, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x1965, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x1966, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x1967, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x1968, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x1969, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x196c, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x196d, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x196e, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x196f, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x19c1, 0x0010, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x19c2, 0x0010, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x19c3, 0x0010, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x19c4, 0x0010, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x19c5, 0x0010, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x19c6, 0x0010, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x19c7, 0x0010, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x19c8, 0x0010, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x19c9, 0x0010, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x19cc, 0x0010, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x19cd, 0x0010, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x19ce, 0x0010, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x19cf, 0x0010, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x1c00, 0x0002, PRE_FETCH_2 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x1c01, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_1 | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x1920, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_2 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x1923, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_2 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x1924, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_2 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x1940, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_2 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x1941, 0x0004, PRE_FETCH_2 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x1943, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_2 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x1944, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_2 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> + { 0x1947, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_2 | CPRE | CMTLB },
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> static struct qcom_smmu *to_qcom_smmu(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>>>> {
>>>> return container_of(smmu, struct qcom_smmu, smmu);
>>>> @@ -459,6 +523,16 @@ static const struct arm_smmu_impl sdm845_smmu_500_impl = {
>>>> .tlb_sync = qcom_smmu_tlb_sync,
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> +
>>>> +static const struct arm_smmu_impl sm8550_smmu_500_impl = {
>>>> + .init_context = qcom_smmu_init_context,
>>>> + .cfg_probe = qcom_smmu_cfg_probe,
>>>> + .def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
>>>> + .reset = arm_mmu500_reset,
>>>> + .write_s2cr = qcom_smmu_write_s2cr,
>>>> + .tlb_sync = qcom_smmu_tlb_sync,
>>>
>>> What is the difference between this one and qcom_smmu_500_impl ?
>>>
>>
>> Noted, will remove this and use qcom_smmu_500_impl instead.
>> Thanks for pointing this out.
>> Since inititally the reset ops was different to reset CPRE bit only for
>> sm8550 SoC hence sm8550_smmu_500_impl is defined, but now default reset
>> ops is modified to set CPRE bit for all SoCs ([PATCH v2 3/3]) so it
>> should be fine to use qcom_smmu_500_impl as there's no difference now.
>>
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_adreno_smmu_v2_impl = {
>>>> .init_context = qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context,
>>>> .def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
>>>> @@ -522,6 +596,11 @@ static const struct qcom_smmu_config qcom_smmu_impl0_cfg = {
>>>> .reg_offset = qcom_smmu_impl0_reg_offset,
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> +static const struct actlr_config sm8550_actlrcfg = {
>>>> + .adata = sm8550_apps_actlr_data,
>>>> + .size = ARRAY_SIZE(sm8550_apps_actlr_data),
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> /*
>>>> * It is not yet possible to use MDP SMMU with the bypass quirk on the msm8996,
>>>> * there are not enough context banks.
>>>> @@ -545,16 +624,20 @@ static const struct qcom_smmu_match_data sdm845_smmu_500_data = {
>>>> /* Also no debug configuration. */
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> +
>>>> +static const struct qcom_smmu_match_data sm8550_smmu_500_impl0_data = {
>>>> + .impl = &sm8550_smmu_500_impl,
>>>> + .adreno_impl = &qcom_adreno_smmu_500_impl,
>>>> + .cfg = &qcom_smmu_impl0_cfg,
>>>> + .actlrcfg = &sm8550_actlrcfg,
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> static const struct qcom_smmu_match_data qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data = {
>>>> .impl = &qcom_smmu_500_impl,
>>>> .adreno_impl = &qcom_adreno_smmu_500_impl,
>>>> .cfg = &qcom_smmu_impl0_cfg,
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> -/*
>>>> - * Do not add any more qcom,SOC-smmu-500 entries to this list, unless they need
>>>> - * special handling and can not be covered by the qcom,smmu-500 entry.
>>>> - */
>>>
>>> NAK, leave this in place.
>>>
>>
>> Ack, will address this in next version.
>>
>>>> static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused qcom_smmu_impl_of_match[] = {
>>>> { .compatible = "qcom,msm8996-smmu-v2", .data = &msm8996_smmu_data },
>>>> { .compatible = "qcom,msm8998-smmu-v2", .data = &qcom_smmu_v2_data },
>>>> @@ -579,6 +662,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused qcom_smmu_impl_of_match[] = {
>>>> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
>>>> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8350-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
>>>> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8450-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
>>>> + { .compatible = "qcom,sm8550-smmu-500", .data = &sm8550_smmu_500_impl0_data },
>>>> { .compatible = "qcom,smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
>>>> { }
>>>> };
>>>> --
>>>> 2.17.1
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists