[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <407a06f8.632a.18bd2a2ece1.Coremail.00107082@163.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 18:59:34 +0800 (CST)
From: "David Wang" <00107082@....com>
To: "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
namhyung@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Regression or Fix]perf: profiling stats sigificantly changed
for aio_write/read(ext4) between 6.7.0-rc1 and 6.6.0
At 2023-11-15 18:32:41, "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
>Namhyung, could you please take a look, you know how to operate this
>cgroup stuff.
>
More information, I run the profiling with 8cpu machine on a SSD with ext4 filesystem :
# mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/mytest
# echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/mytest/cgroup.procs
## Start profiling targeting cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/mytest on another terminal
# fio --randrepeat=1 --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --name=test --bs=4k --iodepth=64 --size=1G --readwrite=randrw --runtime=600 --numjobs=4 --time_based=1
I got a feeling that f06cc667f7990 would decrease total samples by 10%~20% when profiling IO benchmark within cgroup.
David Wang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists