[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231115003527.GW1957730@ZenIV>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 00:35:27 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
Cc: Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@...com>,
syzbot+662f87a8ef490f45fa64@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
autofs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] autofs: fix null deref in autofs_fill_super
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 08:18:33AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> I guess that including the locking is not going to make much difference.
>
> I don't remember now but it was probably done because there may be many
>
> mounts (potentially several thousand) being done and I wanted to get rid
>
> of anything that wasn't needed.
Seeing that lock in question is not going to be contended... ;-)
Seriously, though - the fewer complications we have in the locking rules,
the better.
Al, currently going through audit of ->d_name/->d_parent uses and cursing
at the 600-odd places left to look through...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists