lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231115003527.GW1957730@ZenIV>
Date:   Wed, 15 Nov 2023 00:35:27 +0000
From:   Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
Cc:     Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@...com>,
        syzbot+662f87a8ef490f45fa64@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        autofs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] autofs: fix null deref in autofs_fill_super

On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 08:18:33AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:

> I guess that including the locking is not going to make much difference.
> 
> I don't remember now but it was probably done because there may be many
> 
> mounts (potentially several thousand) being done and I wanted to get rid
> 
> of anything that wasn't needed.

Seeing that lock in question is not going to be contended... ;-)

Seriously, though - the fewer complications we have in the locking rules,
the better.

Al, currently going through audit of ->d_name/->d_parent uses and cursing
at the 600-odd places left to look through...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ