[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d60c1fd1-3ee1-3c15-6072-06c70f09d6d2@bootlin.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 15:24:37 +0100 (CET)
From: Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@...tlin.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
cc: Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@...tlin.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Luka Perkov <luka.perkov@...tura.hr>,
Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/8] net: qualcomm: ipqess: introduce the
Qualcomm IPQESS driver
On Tue, 14 Nov 2023, Andrew Lunn wrote:
...
> > + phy_support_asym_pause(phy);
> > +
> > + ipqess_port_set_state_now(port, BR_STATE_FORWARDING, false);
> > +
> > + if (port->pl)
> > + phylink_start(port->pl);
>
> That looks odd. You unconditionally call phy_support_asym_pause() yet
> conditionally call phylink_start(). I would expect there to always be
> a phylink instance.
>
> Also, you should be telling phylink about the pause capabilities in
> config->mac_capabilities. It is then phylinks problem to tell the PHY,
> or the PCS driving the SFP etc about pause.
You are correct. I probably fumbled this when splitting the calibration code.
> > + if (tx_pause || port->index == 0)
> > + reg |= QCA8K_PORT_STATUS_TXFLOW;
> > + }
> > +
> > + reg |= QCA8K_PORT_STATUS_TXMAC | QCA8K_PORT_STATUS_RXMAC;
> > +
> > + qca8k_write(priv, QCA8K_REG_PORT_STATUS(port->index), reg);
> > +}
>
> qca8k_phylink_mac_link_up() with some refactoring can be
> reused. Please look through the driver and find other instances like
> this where you can reuse more code.
I tried to be conservative with modifying qca8k-common.c when it required
modifying qca8k-8xxx.c. But I'll factor this code more aggressively since you
think it is preferable.
Best,
--
Romain Gantois, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists