[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e0e76948-a0a8-b6c2-163b-1d00afb6650c@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 08:53:00 +0530
From: "Lazar, Lijo" <lijo.lazar@....com>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>,
Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Cc: Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>,
"open list:RADEON and AMDGPU DRM DRIVERS"
<amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"open list:PCI SUBSYSTEM" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>,
Xinhui Pan <Xinhui.Pan@....com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DRM DRIVER FOR NVIDIA GEFORCE/QUADRO GPUS"
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:ACPI" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...hat.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
"open list:DRM DRIVER FOR NVIDIA GEFORCE/QUADRO GPUS"
<nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
"Maciej W . Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] PCI: Exclude PCIe ports used for virtual links in
pcie_bandwidth_available()
On 11/15/2023 1:37 AM, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> The USB4 spec specifies that PCIe ports that are used for tunneling
> PCIe traffic over USB4 fabric will be hardcoded to advertise 2.5GT/s and
> behave as a PCIe Gen1 device. The actual performance of these ports is
> controlled by the fabric implementation.
>
> Callers for pcie_bandwidth_available() will always find the PCIe ports
> used for tunneling as a limiting factor potentially leading to incorrect
> performance decisions.
>
> To prevent such problems check explicitly for ports that are marked as
> virtual links or as thunderbolt controllers and skip them when looking
> for bandwidth limitations of the hierarchy. If the only device connected
> is a port used for tunneling then report that device.
>
> Callers to pcie_bandwidth_available() could make this change on their
> own as well but then they wouldn't be able to detect other potential
> speed bottlenecks from the hierarchy without duplicating
> pcie_bandwidth_available() logic.
>
> Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2925#note_2145860
> Link: https://www.usb.org/document-library/usb4r-specification-v20
> USB4 V2 with Errata and ECN through June 2023
> Section 11.2.1
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
> ---
> v2->v3:
> * Split from previous patch version
> * Look for thunderbolt or virtual link
> ---
> drivers/pci/pci.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index 0ff7883cc774..b1fb2258b211 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -6269,11 +6269,20 @@ static u32 pcie_calc_bw_limits(struct pci_dev *dev, u32 bw,
> * limiting_dev, speed, and width pointers are supplied) information about
> * that point. The bandwidth returned is in Mb/s, i.e., megabits/second of
> * raw bandwidth.
> + *
> + * This excludes the bandwidth calculation that has been returned from a
> + * PCIe device that is used for transmitting tunneled PCIe traffic over a virtual
> + * link part of larger hierarchy. Examples include Thunderbolt3 and USB4 links.
> + * The calculation is excluded because the USB4 specification specifies that the
> + * max speed returned from PCIe configuration registers for the tunneling link is
> + * always PCI 1x 2.5 GT/s. When only tunneled devices are present, the bandwidth
> + * returned is the bandwidth available from the first tunneled device.
> */
> u32 pcie_bandwidth_available(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pci_dev **limiting_dev,
> enum pci_bus_speed *speed,
> enum pcie_link_width *width)
> {
> + struct pci_dev *vdev = NULL;
> u32 bw = 0;
>
> if (speed)
> @@ -6282,10 +6291,20 @@ u32 pcie_bandwidth_available(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pci_dev **limiting_dev,
> *width = PCIE_LNK_WIDTH_UNKNOWN;
>
> while (dev) {
> + if (dev->is_virtual_link || dev->is_thunderbolt) {
> + if (!vdev)
> + vdev = dev;
> + goto skip;
> + }
One problem with this is it *silently* ignores the bandwidth limiting
device - the bandwidth may not be really available if there are virtual
links in between. That is a change in behavior from the messages shown
in __pcie_print_link_status.
Thanks,
Lijo
> bw = pcie_calc_bw_limits(dev, bw, limiting_dev, speed, width);
> +skip:
> dev = pci_upstream_bridge(dev);
> }
>
> + /* If nothing "faster" found on hierarchy, limit to first virtual link */
> + if (vdev && !bw)
> + bw = pcie_calc_bw_limits(vdev, bw, limiting_dev, speed, width);
> +
> return bw;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcie_bandwidth_available);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists