linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] bpf: bpf_iter_task_next: use __next_thread() rather than next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 15 Nov 2023 22:34:10 -0500
From:   Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>
To:     Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc:     Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@...edance.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] bpf: bpf_iter_task_next: use __next_thread() rather
 than next_thread()


On 11/14/23 11:32 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Lockless use of next_thread() should be avoided, kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
> is the last user and the usage is wrong.
>
> bpf_iter_task_next() can loop forever, "kit->pos == kit->task" can never
> happen if kit->pos execs. Change this code to use __next_thread().
>
> With or without this change the usage of kit->pos/task and next_task()
> doesn't look nice, see the next patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>