linux-kernel - Re: Re: [PATCH 1/4] sched/eevdf: Fix vruntime adjustment on reweight

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <23cebdf8-1a51-481e-a8c2-e17021099e05@bytedance.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Nov 2023 12:48:04 +0800
From:   Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@...edance.com>
To:     Yiwei Lin <s921975628@...il.com>
Cc:     Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>,
        Benjamin Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
        Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
        Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
        "Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
        Qais Yousef <qyousef@...alina.io>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...wei.com>,
        Youssef Esmat <youssefesmat@...omium.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 1/4] sched/eevdf: Fix vruntime adjustment on reweight

On 11/15/23 11:36 PM, Yiwei Lin Wrote:
> 
>> @@ -3712,8 +3811,17 @@ static void reweight_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se,
>>       enqueue_load_avg(cfs_rq, se);
>>       if (se->on_rq) {
>>           update_load_add(&cfs_rq->load, se->load.weight);
>> -        if (cfs_rq->curr != se)
>> -            avg_vruntime_add(cfs_rq, se);
>> +        if (!curr) {
>> +            /*
>> +             * The entity's vruntime has been adjusted, so let's check
>> +             * whether the rq-wide min_vruntime needs updated too. Since
>> +             * the calculations above require stable min_vruntime rather
>> +             * than up-to-date one, we do the update at the end of the
>> +             * reweight process.
>> +             */
>> +            __enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se);
>> +            update_min_vruntime(cfs_rq);
>> +        }
>>       }
>>   }
> Sorry if I am asking stupid question...... It looks like reweight_entity() may have chance to change the weight of cfs_rq->curr entity, but we'll never update_min_vruntime() when reweighting it. Is there any reason that we can skip the update_min_vruntime() for this case?

No, you are right!

Thanks!
	Abel