[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87o7fu5eex.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 08:46:14 +0100
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To: Zack Rusin <zackr@...are.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"olvaffe@...il.com" <olvaffe@...il.com>,
"daniel.vetter@...ll.ch" <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
"nunes.erico@...il.com" <nunes.erico@...il.com>,
"airlied@...hat.com" <airlied@...hat.com>,
"pekka.paalanen@...labora.com" <pekka.paalanen@...labora.com>,
"tzimmermann@...e.de" <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
"belmouss@...hat.com" <belmouss@...hat.com>,
"mripard@...nel.org" <mripard@...nel.org>,
"daniel@...ll.ch" <daniel@...ll.ch>,
"gurchetansingh@...omium.org" <gurchetansingh@...omium.org>,
"maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com"
<maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"kraxel@...hat.com" <kraxel@...hat.com>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux.dev" <virtualization@...ts.linux.dev>,
"airlied@...il.com" <airlied@...il.com>,
Linux-graphics-maintainer <Linux-graphics-maintainer@...are.com>,
"contact@...rsion.fr" <contact@...rsion.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] drm: Allow the damage helpers to handle buffer
damage
Zack Rusin <zackr@...are.com> writes:
Hello Zack,
> On Wed, 2023-11-15 at 14:15 +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
[...]
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Add a struct drm_plane_state .ignore_damage_clips to set in the plane's
>> .atomic_check, instead of having different helpers (Thomas Zimmermann).
>> - Set struct drm_plane_state .ignore_damage_clips in virtio-gpu plane's
>> .atomic_check instead of using a different helpers (Thomas Zimmermann).
>> - Set struct drm_plane_state .ignore_damage_clips in vmwgfx plane's
>> .atomic_check instead of using a different helpers (Thomas Zimmermann).
>
> The series looks good to me, thanks for tackling this. I'm surprised that we don't
Thanks. Can I get your r-b or a-b ?
> have any IGT tests for this. Seems like it shouldn't be too hard to test it in a
> generic way with just a couple of dumb buffers.
>
Yes, I haven't looked at it but also think that shouldn't be that hard.
> z
--
Best regards,
Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat
Powered by blists - more mailing lists