[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231116074706.3448008-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 15:47:05 +0800
From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
To: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>
CC: <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Fix 32-bit compatible userspace write size overflow error
For 32-bit compatible userspace program, write with size = -1 return not
-1 but unexpected other values, which is due to the __access_ok() check is
not right. The specified "addr + size" is greater than 32-bit limit and
should return -EFAULT, but TASK_SIZE_MAX still defined as UL(1) << VA_BITS
in U32 mode, which is much greater than "addr + size" and cannot catch the
overflow error.
Fix above error by checking 32-bit limit if it is 32-bit compatible
userspace program.
How to reproduce:
The test program is as below:
cat test.c
#include <unistd.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <assert.h>
#define pinfo(fmt, args...) \
fprintf(stderr, "[INFO][%s][%d][%s]:"fmt, \
__FILE__,__LINE__,__func__,##args)
#undef SIZE_MAX
#define SIZE_MAX -1
int main()
{
char wbuf[3] = { 'x', 'y', 'z' };
char *path = "write.tmp";
int ret;
int fd = open(path, O_RDWR | O_CREAT);
if (fd<0)
{
pinfo("fd=%d\n", fd);
exit(-1);
}
assert(write(fd, wbuf, 3) == 3);
ret = write (fd, wbuf, SIZE_MAX);
pinfo("ret=%d\n", ret);
pinfo("size_max=%d\n",SIZE_MAX);
assert(ret==-1);
close(fd);
pinfo("INFO: end\n");
return 0;
}
aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc --static test.c -o test
arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc --static test.c -o test32
Before applying this patch, userspace 32-bit program return 1112 if the
write size = -1 as below:
/root # ./test
[INFO][test.c][32][main]:ret=-1
[INFO][test.c][33][main]:size_max=-1
[INFO][test.c][36][main]:INFO: end
/root # ./test32
[INFO][test.c][32][main]:ret=1112
[INFO][test.c][33][main]:size_max=-1
test32: test.c:34: main: Assertion `ret==-1' failed.
Aborted
After applying this patch, userspace 32-bit program return -1 if the write
size = -1 as expected as below:
/root # ./test
[INFO][test.c][32][main]:ret=-1
[INFO][test.c][33][main]:size_max=-1
[INFO][test.c][36][main]:INFO: end
/root # ./test32
[INFO][test.c][32][main]:ret=-1
[INFO][test.c][33][main]:size_max=-1
[INFO][test.c][36][main]:INFO: end
Fixes: 967747bbc084 ("uaccess: remove CONFIG_SET_FS")
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
index e5bc54522e71..6a087d58a90a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -52,7 +52,12 @@
#define DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW_64 (UL(1) << VA_BITS_MIN)
#define TASK_SIZE_64 (UL(1) << vabits_actual)
+#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
+#define TASK_SIZE_MAX (test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? \
+ UL(0x100000000) : (UL(1) << VA_BITS))
+#else
#define TASK_SIZE_MAX (UL(1) << VA_BITS)
+#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
#if defined(CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES) && defined(CONFIG_KUSER_HELPERS)
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists