[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <236e122b-a24b-4eb9-865e-a54979a3f0c0@bytedance.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 17:01:02 +0800
From: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@...edance.com>
To: Yiwei Lin <s921975628@...il.com>
Cc: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>,
Benjamin Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Qais Yousef <qyousef@...alina.io>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...wei.com>,
Youssef Esmat <youssefesmat@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 1/4] sched/eevdf: Fix vruntime adjustment on reweight
On 11/16/23 12:59 PM, Yiwei Lin Wrote:
>
> On 11/16/23 12:48, Abel Wu wrote:
>> On 11/15/23 11:36 PM, Yiwei Lin Wrote:
>>>
>>>> @@ -3712,8 +3811,17 @@ static void reweight_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se,
>>>> enqueue_load_avg(cfs_rq, se);
>>>> if (se->on_rq) {
>>>> update_load_add(&cfs_rq->load, se->load.weight);
>>>> - if (cfs_rq->curr != se)
>>>> - avg_vruntime_add(cfs_rq, se);
>>>> + if (!curr) {
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * The entity's vruntime has been adjusted, so let's check
>>>> + * whether the rq-wide min_vruntime needs updated too. Since
>>>> + * the calculations above require stable min_vruntime rather
>>>> + * than up-to-date one, we do the update at the end of the
>>>> + * reweight process.
>>>> + */
>>>> + __enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se);
>>>> + update_min_vruntime(cfs_rq);
>>>> + }
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>> Sorry if I am asking stupid question...... It looks like reweight_entity() may have chance to change the weight of cfs_rq->curr entity, but we'll never update_min_vruntime() when reweighting it. Is there any reason that we can skip the update_min_vruntime() for this case?
>>
>> No, you are right!
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Abel
> Thank you! I'll take the responsibility to fix this.
That would be appreciated. I suggest fixing this before we
do further optimizations.
Thanks,
Abel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists