linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] OPP: Use _set_opp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231116104434.fnukzusznc3kifbn@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Thu, 16 Nov 2023 16:14:34 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@...nkonzept.com>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] OPP: Use _set_opp_level() for single genpd case

On 15-11-23, 11:02, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 10-11-23, 14:50, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > If this is only for required-opps and devices being hooked up to a PM
> > domain (genpd), my suggestion would be to keep avoiding doing the
> > propagation to required-opps-parents. For the similar reasons to why
> > we don't do it for clock/regulators, the propagation and aggregation,
> > seems to me, to belong better in genpd.
> > 
> > Did that make sense?
> 
> Hmm, it does. Let me see what I can do on this..

Hi Ulf,

I have sent V3 with a new commit at the end to take care of this.

-- 
viresh