lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4767b8d1-a613-43ff-b511-b47e98e89f56@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Nov 2023 11:58:22 +0100
From:   Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@...el.com>
To:     Suman Ghosh <sumang@...vell.com>, <sgoutham@...vell.com>,
        <gakula@...vell.com>, <sbhatta@...vell.com>, <hkelam@...vell.com>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
        <pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <lcherian@...vell.com>,
        <jerinj@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 2/2] octeontx2-pf: TC flower offload support for
 mirror



On 16.11.2023 11:16, Suman Ghosh wrote:
> This patch extends TC flower offload support for mirroring ingress/egress
> traffic to a different PF/VF. Below is an example command,
> 
> 'tc filter add dev eth1 ingress protocol ip flower src_ip <ip-addr>
> skip_sw action mirred ingress mirror dev eth2'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suman Ghosh <sumang@...vell.com>
> ---

Only small nits,
Reviewed-by: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@...el.com>

>  .../ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_tc.c  | 110 +++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 108 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_tc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_tc.c
> index 8a5e3987a482..cfcf935b1003 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_tc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_tc.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
>  
>  #define OTX2_UNSUPP_LSE_DEPTH		GENMASK(6, 4)
>  
> +#define MCAST_INVALID_GRP		(-1U)
> +
>  struct otx2_tc_flow_stats {
>  	u64 bytes;
>  	u64 pkts;
> @@ -47,6 +49,7 @@ struct otx2_tc_flow {
>  	bool				is_act_police;
>  	u32				prio;
>  	struct npc_install_flow_req	req;
> +	u32				mcast_grp_idx;
>  };
>  
>  static void otx2_get_egress_burst_cfg(struct otx2_nic *nic, u32 burst,
> @@ -336,22 +339,95 @@ static int otx2_tc_act_set_police(struct otx2_nic *nic,
>  	return rc;
>  }
>  
> +static int otx2_tc_update_mcast(struct otx2_nic *nic,
> +				struct npc_install_flow_req *req,
> +				struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
> +				struct otx2_tc_flow *node,
> +				struct nix_mcast_grp_update_req *ureq,
> +				u8 num_intf)
> +{
> +	struct nix_mcast_grp_update_req *grp_update_req;
> +	struct nix_mcast_grp_create_req *creq;
> +	struct nix_mcast_grp_create_rsp *crsp;
> +	u32 grp_index;
> +	int rc;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&nic->mbox.lock);
> +	creq = otx2_mbox_alloc_msg_nix_mcast_grp_create(&nic->mbox);
> +	if (!creq) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&nic->mbox.lock);

I would put mutex_unlock at the end and use goto but it's up to you.

> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	creq->dir = NIX_MCAST_INGRESS;
> +	/* Send message to AF */
> +	rc = otx2_sync_mbox_msg(&nic->mbox);
> +	if (rc) {
> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Failed to create multicast group");
> +		mutex_unlock(&nic->mbox.lock);
> +		return rc;
> +	}
> +
> +	crsp = (struct nix_mcast_grp_create_rsp *)otx2_mbox_get_rsp(&nic->mbox.mbox,
> +			0,
> +			&creq->hdr);
> +	if (IS_ERR(crsp)) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&nic->mbox.lock);
> +		return PTR_ERR(crsp);
> +	}
> +
> +	grp_index = crsp->mcast_grp_idx;
> +	grp_update_req = otx2_mbox_alloc_msg_nix_mcast_grp_update(&nic->mbox);
> +	if (!grp_update_req) {
> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Failed to update multicast group");
> +		mutex_unlock(&nic->mbox.lock);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	ureq->op = NIX_MCAST_OP_ADD_ENTRY;
> +	ureq->mcast_grp_idx = grp_index;
> +	ureq->num_mce_entry = num_intf;
> +	ureq->pcifunc[0] = nic->pcifunc;
> +	ureq->channel[0] = nic->hw.tx_chan_base;
> +
> +	ureq->dest_type[0] = NIX_RX_RSS;
> +	ureq->rq_rss_index[0] = 0;
> +	memcpy(&ureq->hdr, &grp_update_req->hdr, sizeof(struct mbox_msghdr));
> +	memcpy(grp_update_req, ureq, sizeof(struct nix_mcast_grp_update_req));
> +
> +	/* Send message to AF */
> +	rc = otx2_sync_mbox_msg(&nic->mbox);
> +	if (rc) {
> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Failed to update multicast group");
> +		mutex_unlock(&nic->mbox.lock);
> +		return rc;
> +	}
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&nic->mbox.lock);
> +	req->op = NIX_RX_ACTIONOP_MCAST;
> +	req->index = grp_index;
> +	node->mcast_grp_idx = grp_index;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int otx2_tc_parse_actions(struct otx2_nic *nic,
>  				 struct flow_action *flow_action,
>  				 struct npc_install_flow_req *req,
>  				 struct flow_cls_offload *f,
>  				 struct otx2_tc_flow *node)
>  {
> +	struct nix_mcast_grp_update_req dummy_grp_update_req = { 0 };
>  	struct netlink_ext_ack *extack = f->common.extack;
> +	bool pps = false, mcast = false;
>  	struct flow_action_entry *act;
>  	struct net_device *target;
>  	struct otx2_nic *priv;
>  	u32 burst, mark = 0;
>  	u8 nr_police = 0;
> -	bool pps = false;
> +	u8 num_intf = 1;
> +	int rc, i;
>  	u64 rate;
>  	int err;
> -	int i;
>  
>  	if (!flow_action_has_entries(flow_action)) {
>  		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "no tc actions specified");
> @@ -423,11 +499,30 @@ static int otx2_tc_parse_actions(struct otx2_nic *nic,
>  			req->index = act->rx_queue;
>  			break;
>  
> +		case FLOW_ACTION_MIRRED_INGRESS:
> +			target = act->dev;
> +			priv = netdev_priv(target);
> +			dummy_grp_update_req.pcifunc[num_intf] = priv->pcifunc;
> +			dummy_grp_update_req.channel[num_intf] = priv->hw.tx_chan_base;
> +			dummy_grp_update_req.dest_type[num_intf] = NIX_RX_RSS;
> +			dummy_grp_update_req.rq_rss_index[num_intf] = 0;
> +			mcast = true;
> +			num_intf++;
> +			break;
> +
>  		default:
>  			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	if (mcast) {
> +		rc = otx2_tc_update_mcast(nic, req, extack, node,
> +					  &dummy_grp_update_req,
> +					  num_intf);
> +		if (rc)
> +			return rc;

I think we can use err here, no need for new variable

> +	}
> +
>  	if (nr_police > 1) {
>  		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
>  				   "rate limit police offload requires a single action");
> @@ -1033,6 +1128,7 @@ static int otx2_tc_del_flow(struct otx2_nic *nic,
>  			    struct flow_cls_offload *tc_flow_cmd)
>  {
>  	struct otx2_flow_config *flow_cfg = nic->flow_cfg;
> +	struct nix_mcast_grp_destroy_req *grp_destroy_req;
>  	struct otx2_tc_flow *flow_node;
>  	int err;
>  
> @@ -1064,6 +1160,15 @@ static int otx2_tc_del_flow(struct otx2_nic *nic,
>  		mutex_unlock(&nic->mbox.lock);
>  	}
>  
> +	/* Remove the multicast/mirror related nodes */
> +	if (flow_node->mcast_grp_idx != MCAST_INVALID_GRP) {
> +		mutex_lock(&nic->mbox.lock);
> +		grp_destroy_req = otx2_mbox_alloc_msg_nix_mcast_grp_destroy(&nic->mbox);
> +		grp_destroy_req->mcast_grp_idx = flow_node->mcast_grp_idx;
> +		otx2_sync_mbox_msg(&nic->mbox);
> +		mutex_unlock(&nic->mbox.lock);
> +	}
> +
>  	otx2_del_mcam_flow_entry(nic, flow_node->entry, NULL);
>  	otx2_tc_update_mcam_table(nic, flow_cfg, flow_node, false);
>  	kfree_rcu(flow_node, rcu);
> @@ -1096,6 +1201,7 @@ static int otx2_tc_add_flow(struct otx2_nic *nic,
>  	spin_lock_init(&new_node->lock);
>  	new_node->cookie = tc_flow_cmd->cookie;
>  	new_node->prio = tc_flow_cmd->common.prio;
> +	new_node->mcast_grp_idx = MCAST_INVALID_GRP;
>  
>  	memset(&dummy, 0, sizeof(struct npc_install_flow_req));
>  

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ