Message-ID: <1459f78b-e80c-4f21-bc65-f0ab259d348a@arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Nov 2023 11:20:27 +0000
From:   Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
To:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/14] mm: Batch-copy PTE ranges during fork()

On 16/11/2023 11:03, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 15.11.23 17:30, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>> Convert copy_pte_range() to copy a set of ptes in a batch. A given batch
>> maps a physically contiguous block of memory, all belonging to the same
>> folio, with the same permissions, and for shared mappings, the same
>> dirty state. This will likely improve performance by a tiny amount due
>> to batching the folio reference count management and calling set_ptes()
>> rather than making individual calls to set_pte_at().
>>
>> However, the primary motivation for this change is to reduce the number
>> of tlb maintenance operations that the arm64 backend has to perform
>> during fork, as it is about to add transparent support for the
>> "contiguous bit" in its ptes. By write-protecting the parent using the
>> new ptep_set_wrprotects() (note the 's' at the end) function, the
>> backend can avoid having to unfold contig ranges of PTEs, which is
>> expensive, when all ptes in the range are being write-protected.
>> Similarly, by using set_ptes() rather than set_pte_at() to set up ptes
>> in the child, the backend does not need to fold a contiguous range once
>> they are all populated - they can be initially populated as a contiguous
>> range in the first place.
>>
>> This change addresses the core-mm refactoring only, and introduces
>> ptep_set_wrprotects() with a default implementation that calls
>> ptep_set_wrprotect() for each pte in the range. A separate change will
>> implement ptep_set_wrprotects() in the arm64 backend to realize the
>> performance improvement as part of the work to enable contpte mappings.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
>> ---
>>   include/linux/pgtable.h |  13 +++
>>   mm/memory.c             | 175 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>   2 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pgtable.h b/include/linux/pgtable.h
>> index af7639c3b0a3..1c50f8a0fdde 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pgtable.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pgtable.h
>> @@ -622,6 +622,19 @@ static inline void ptep_set_wrprotect(struct mm_struct
>> *mm, unsigned long addres
>>   }
>>   #endif
>>   +#ifndef ptep_set_wrprotects
>> +struct mm_struct;
>> +static inline void ptep_set_wrprotects(struct mm_struct *mm,
>> +                unsigned long address, pte_t *ptep,
>> +                unsigned int nr)
>> +{
>> +    unsigned int i;
>> +
>> +    for (i = 0; i < nr; i++, address += PAGE_SIZE, ptep++)
>> +        ptep_set_wrprotect(mm, address, ptep);
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>>   /*
>>    * On some architectures hardware does not set page access bit when accessing
>>    * memory page, it is responsibility of software setting this bit. It brings
>> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
>> index 1f18ed4a5497..b7c8228883cf 100644
>> --- a/mm/memory.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory.c
>> @@ -921,46 +921,129 @@ copy_present_page(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma,
>> struct vm_area_struct *src_vma
>>           /* Uffd-wp needs to be delivered to dest pte as well */
>>           pte = pte_mkuffd_wp(pte);
>>       set_pte_at(dst_vma->vm_mm, addr, dst_pte, pte);
>> -    return 0;
>> +    return 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline unsigned long page_cont_mapped_vaddr(struct page *page,
>> +                struct page *anchor, unsigned long anchor_vaddr)
>> +{
>> +    unsigned long offset;
>> +    unsigned long vaddr;
>> +
>> +    offset = (page_to_pfn(page) - page_to_pfn(anchor)) << PAGE_SHIFT;
>> +    vaddr = anchor_vaddr + offset;
>> +
>> +    if (anchor > page) {
>> +        if (vaddr > anchor_vaddr)
>> +            return 0;
>> +    } else {
>> +        if (vaddr < anchor_vaddr)
>> +            return ULONG_MAX;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return vaddr;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int folio_nr_pages_cont_mapped(struct folio *folio,
>> +                      struct page *page, pte_t *pte,
>> +                      unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
>> +                      pte_t ptent, bool *any_dirty)
>> +{
>> +    int floops;
>> +    int i;
>> +    unsigned long pfn;
>> +    pgprot_t prot;
>> +    struct page *folio_end;
>> +
>> +    if (!folio_test_large(folio))
>> +        return 1;
>> +
>> +    folio_end = &folio->page + folio_nr_pages(folio);
>> +    end = min(page_cont_mapped_vaddr(folio_end, page, addr), end);
>> +    floops = (end - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> +    pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
>> +    prot = pte_pgprot(pte_mkold(pte_mkclean(ptent)));
>> +
>> +    *any_dirty = pte_dirty(ptent);
>> +
>> +    pfn++;
>> +    pte++;
>> +
>> +    for (i = 1; i < floops; i++) {
>> +        ptent = ptep_get(pte);
>> +        ptent = pte_mkold(pte_mkclean(ptent));
>> +
>> +        if (!pte_present(ptent) || pte_pfn(ptent) != pfn ||
>> +            pgprot_val(pte_pgprot(ptent)) != pgprot_val(prot))
>> +            break;
>> +
>> +        if (pte_dirty(ptent))
>> +            *any_dirty = true;
>> +
>> +        pfn++;
>> +        pte++;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return i;
>>   }
>>     /*
>> - * Copy one pte.  Returns 0 if succeeded, or -EAGAIN if one preallocated page
>> - * is required to copy this pte.
>> + * Copy set of contiguous ptes.  Returns number of ptes copied if succeeded
>> + * (always gte 1), or -EAGAIN if one preallocated page is required to copy the
>> + * first pte.
>>    */
>>   static inline int
>> -copy_present_pte(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma,
>> -         pte_t *dst_pte, pte_t *src_pte, unsigned long addr, int *rss,
>> -         struct folio **prealloc)
>> +copy_present_ptes(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct
>> *src_vma,
>> +          pte_t *dst_pte, pte_t *src_pte,
>> +          unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
>> +          int *rss, struct folio **prealloc)
>>   {
>>       struct mm_struct *src_mm = src_vma->vm_mm;
>>       unsigned long vm_flags = src_vma->vm_flags;
>>       pte_t pte = ptep_get(src_pte);
>>       struct page *page;
>>       struct folio *folio;
>> +    int nr = 1;
>> +    bool anon;
>> +    bool any_dirty = pte_dirty(pte);
>> +    int i;
>>         page = vm_normal_page(src_vma, addr, pte);
>> -    if (page)
>> +    if (page) {
>>           folio = page_folio(page);
>> -    if (page && folio_test_anon(folio)) {
>> -        /*
>> -         * If this page may have been pinned by the parent process,
>> -         * copy the page immediately for the child so that we'll always
>> -         * guarantee the pinned page won't be randomly replaced in the
>> -         * future.
>> -         */
>> -        folio_get(folio);
>> -        if (unlikely(page_try_dup_anon_rmap(page, false, src_vma))) {
>> -            /* Page may be pinned, we have to copy. */
>> -            folio_put(folio);
>> -            return copy_present_page(dst_vma, src_vma, dst_pte, src_pte,
>> -                         addr, rss, prealloc, page);
>> +        anon = folio_test_anon(folio);
>> +        nr = folio_nr_pages_cont_mapped(folio, page, src_pte, addr,
>> +                        end, pte, &any_dirty);
>> +
>> +        for (i = 0; i < nr; i++, page++) {
>> +            if (anon) {
>> +                /*
>> +                 * If this page may have been pinned by the
>> +                 * parent process, copy the page immediately for
>> +                 * the child so that we'll always guarantee the
>> +                 * pinned page won't be randomly replaced in the
>> +                 * future.
>> +                 */
>> +                if (unlikely(page_try_dup_anon_rmap(
>> +                        page, false, src_vma))) {
>> +                    if (i != 0)
>> +                        break;
>> +                    /* Page may be pinned, we have to copy. */
>> +                    return copy_present_page(
>> +                        dst_vma, src_vma, dst_pte,
>> +                        src_pte, addr, rss, prealloc,
>> +                        page);
>> +                }
>> +                rss[MM_ANONPAGES]++;
>> +                VM_BUG_ON(PageAnonExclusive(page));
>> +            } else {
>> +                page_dup_file_rmap(page, false);
>> +                rss[mm_counter_file(page)]++;
>> +            }
>>           }
>> -        rss[MM_ANONPAGES]++;
>> -    } else if (page) {
>> -        folio_get(folio);
>> -        page_dup_file_rmap(page, false);
>> -        rss[mm_counter_file(page)]++;
>> +
>> +        nr = i;
>> +        folio_ref_add(folio, nr);
>>       }
>>         /*
>> @@ -968,24 +1051,28 @@ copy_present_pte(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct
>> vm_area_struct *src_vma,
>>        * in the parent and the child
>>        */
>>       if (is_cow_mapping(vm_flags) && pte_write(pte)) {
>> -        ptep_set_wrprotect(src_mm, addr, src_pte);
>> +        ptep_set_wrprotects(src_mm, addr, src_pte, nr);
>>           pte = pte_wrprotect(pte);
> 
> You likely want an "any_pte_writable" check here instead, no?
> 
> Any operations that target a single indiividual PTE while multiple PTEs are
> adjusted are suspicious :)

The idea is that I've already constrained the batch of pages such that the
permissions are all the same (see folio_nr_pages_cont_mapped()). So if the first
pte is writable, then they all are - something has gone badly wrong if some are
writable and others are not.

The dirty bit has any_dirty special case, because we (deliberately) don't
consider access/dirty when determining the batch. Given the batch is all covered
by the same folio, and the kernel maintains the access/dirty info per-folio, we
don't want to uneccessarily reduce the batch size just because one of the pages
in the folio has been written to.

> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists