linux-kernel - [PATCH] sched/fair: Update min_vruntime for reweight

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20231116114217.90553-1-s921975628@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Nov 2023 19:42:17 +0800
From:   Yiwei Lin <s921975628@...il.com>
To:     mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org
Cc:     vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
        wuyun.abel@...edance.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        s921975628@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair: Update min_vruntime for reweight_entity() correctly

Since reweight_entity() may have chance to change the weight of
cfs_rq->curr entity, we should also update_min_vruntime() if
this is the case

Signed-off-by: Yiwei Lin <s921975628@...il.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 07f555857..6fb89f4a3 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -3815,17 +3815,17 @@ static void reweight_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se,
 	enqueue_load_avg(cfs_rq, se);
 	if (se->on_rq) {
 		update_load_add(&cfs_rq->load, se->load.weight);
-		if (!curr) {
-			/*
-			 * The entity's vruntime has been adjusted, so let's check
-			 * whether the rq-wide min_vruntime needs updated too. Since
-			 * the calculations above require stable min_vruntime rather
-			 * than up-to-date one, we do the update at the end of the
-			 * reweight process.
-			 */
+		if (!curr)
 			__enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se);
-			update_min_vruntime(cfs_rq);
-		}
+
+		/*
+		 * The entity's vruntime has been adjusted, so let's check
+		 * whether the rq-wide min_vruntime needs updated too. Since
+		 * the calculations above require stable min_vruntime rather
+		 * than up-to-date one, we do the update at the end of the
+		 * reweight process.
+		 */
+		update_min_vruntime(cfs_rq);
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.34.1