linux-kernel - [PATCH] kselftest/arm64: Fix output formatting for za-fork

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20231116-arm64-fix-za-fork-output-v1-1-42c03d4f5759@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 16 Nov 2023 12:52:29 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] kselftest/arm64: Fix output formatting for za-fork

The za-fork test does not output a newline when reporting the result of
the one test it runs, causing the counts printed by kselftest to be
included in the test name.  Add the newline.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/za-fork.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/za-fork.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/za-fork.c
index b86cb1049497..587b94648222 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/za-fork.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/za-fork.c
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 	 */
 	ret = open("/proc/sys/abi/sme_default_vector_length", O_RDONLY, 0);
 	if (ret >= 0) {
-		ksft_test_result(fork_test(), "fork_test");
+		ksft_test_result(fork_test(), "fork_test\n");
 
 	} else {
 		ksft_print_msg("SME not supported\n");

---
base-commit: b85ea95d086471afb4ad062012a4d73cd328fa86
change-id: 20231115-arm64-fix-za-fork-output-21cdd7a7195c

Best regards,
-- 
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>