lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbDny8X3WB_qJ4h_vbwrjno5ytAtNMgTeXg4jpegdUH2w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Nov 2023 14:43:42 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: don't use gpiod_to_chip()

On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 5:50 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:

> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
>
> Let's start working towards removing gpiod_to_chip() from the kernel.
> Start with pinctrl. The first patch should go through the GPIO tree
> and become available through an immutable tag so that we can get more
> conversions in this cycle elsewhere.

Fair enough, maybe an immutable branch with all three patches?
Probably best to merga all three into both subsystems I think.

Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ