[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231116134757.zu7axb6cvriqjm6y@mercury.elektranox.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 14:47:57 +0100
From: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
To: Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Andy Yan <andyshrk@....com>,
heiko@...ech.de, hjc@...k-chips.com,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, kever.yang@...k-chips.com,
chris.obbard@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] drm/rockchip: vop2: Add support for rk3588
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 06:39:40PM +0800, Andy Yan wrote:
> > > vop2->sys_grf = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node, "rockchip,grf");
> > This already lacks an error check, shame on me...
> >
> > > + vop2->vop_grf = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node, "rockchip,vop-grf");
> > > + vop2->vo1_grf = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node, "rockchip,vo1-grf");
> > > + vop2->sys_pmu = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node, "rockchip,pmu");
> > ... but please don't duplicate that.
>
> It a little difficult to find a proper way to do the check, as not every soc need all these phandles.
>
> Do i need check it per soc?
I suggest adding a u32 flags to struct vop2_data and then have
something like this:
if (vop2_data->flags & VOP2_HAS_VOP_GRF) {
vop2->vop_grf = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node, "rockchip,vop-grf");
if (IS_ERR(vop2->vop_grf))
return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(vop2->vop_grf) "cannot get vop-grf");
}
if (vop2_data->flags & VOP2_HAS_VO1_GRF) {
vop2->vo1_grf = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node, "rockchip,vo1-grf");
if (IS_ERR(vop2->vo1_grf))
return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(vop2->vo1_grf) "cannot get vo1-grf");
}
...
Greetings,
-- Sebastian
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists