| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <2d027a8d-adfb-481d-89ea-c99139e669aa@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 13:49:13 +0000
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/14] mm: Batch-copy PTE ranges during fork()
On 16/11/2023 13:20, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 16.11.23 12:20, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>> On 16/11/2023 11:03, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> On 15.11.23 17:30, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>>>> Convert copy_pte_range() to copy a set of ptes in a batch. A given batch
>>>> maps a physically contiguous block of memory, all belonging to the same
>>>> folio, with the same permissions, and for shared mappings, the same
>>>> dirty state. This will likely improve performance by a tiny amount due
>>>> to batching the folio reference count management and calling set_ptes()
>>>> rather than making individual calls to set_pte_at().
>>>>
>>>> However, the primary motivation for this change is to reduce the number
>>>> of tlb maintenance operations that the arm64 backend has to perform
>>>> during fork, as it is about to add transparent support for the
>>>> "contiguous bit" in its ptes. By write-protecting the parent using the
>>>> new ptep_set_wrprotects() (note the 's' at the end) function, the
>>>> backend can avoid having to unfold contig ranges of PTEs, which is
>>>> expensive, when all ptes in the range are being write-protected.
>>>> Similarly, by using set_ptes() rather than set_pte_at() to set up ptes
>>>> in the child, the backend does not need to fold a contiguous range once
>>>> they are all populated - they can be initially populated as a contiguous
>>>> range in the first place.
>>>>
>>>> This change addresses the core-mm refactoring only, and introduces
>>>> ptep_set_wrprotects() with a default implementation that calls
>>>> ptep_set_wrprotect() for each pte in the range. A separate change will
>>>> implement ptep_set_wrprotects() in the arm64 backend to realize the
>>>> performance improvement as part of the work to enable contpte mappings.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
>>>> ---
>>>> include/linux/pgtable.h | 13 +++
>>>> mm/memory.c | 175 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>>> 2 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/pgtable.h b/include/linux/pgtable.h
>>>> index af7639c3b0a3..1c50f8a0fdde 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/pgtable.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/pgtable.h
>>>> @@ -622,6 +622,19 @@ static inline void ptep_set_wrprotect(struct mm_struct
>>>> *mm, unsigned long addres
>>>> }
>>>> #endif
>>>> +#ifndef ptep_set_wrprotects
>>>> +struct mm_struct;
>>>> +static inline void ptep_set_wrprotects(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>>> + unsigned long address, pte_t *ptep,
>>>> + unsigned int nr)
>>>> +{
>>>> + unsigned int i;
>>>> +
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < nr; i++, address += PAGE_SIZE, ptep++)
>>>> + ptep_set_wrprotect(mm, address, ptep);
>>>> +}
>>>> +#endif
>>>> +
>>>> /*
>>>> * On some architectures hardware does not set page access bit when
>>>> accessing
>>>> * memory page, it is responsibility of software setting this bit. It brings
>>>> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
>>>> index 1f18ed4a5497..b7c8228883cf 100644
>>>> --- a/mm/memory.c
>>>> +++ b/mm/memory.c
>>>> @@ -921,46 +921,129 @@ copy_present_page(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma,
>>>> struct vm_area_struct *src_vma
>>>> /* Uffd-wp needs to be delivered to dest pte as well */
>>>> pte = pte_mkuffd_wp(pte);
>>>> set_pte_at(dst_vma->vm_mm, addr, dst_pte, pte);
>>>> - return 0;
>>>> + return 1;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static inline unsigned long page_cont_mapped_vaddr(struct page *page,
>>>> + struct page *anchor, unsigned long anchor_vaddr)
>>>> +{
>>>> + unsigned long offset;
>>>> + unsigned long vaddr;
>>>> +
>>>> + offset = (page_to_pfn(page) - page_to_pfn(anchor)) << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>> + vaddr = anchor_vaddr + offset;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (anchor > page) {
>>>> + if (vaddr > anchor_vaddr)
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + if (vaddr < anchor_vaddr)
>>>> + return ULONG_MAX;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + return vaddr;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int folio_nr_pages_cont_mapped(struct folio *folio,
>>>> + struct page *page, pte_t *pte,
>>>> + unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
>>>> + pte_t ptent, bool *any_dirty)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int floops;
>>>> + int i;
>>>> + unsigned long pfn;
>>>> + pgprot_t prot;
>>>> + struct page *folio_end;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!folio_test_large(folio))
>>>> + return 1;
>>>> +
>>>> + folio_end = &folio->page + folio_nr_pages(folio);
>>>> + end = min(page_cont_mapped_vaddr(folio_end, page, addr), end);
>>>> + floops = (end - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>> + pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
>>>> + prot = pte_pgprot(pte_mkold(pte_mkclean(ptent)));
>>>> +
>>>> + *any_dirty = pte_dirty(ptent);
>>>> +
>>>> + pfn++;
>>>> + pte++;
>>>> +
>>>> + for (i = 1; i < floops; i++) {
>>>> + ptent = ptep_get(pte);
>>>> + ptent = pte_mkold(pte_mkclean(ptent));
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!pte_present(ptent) || pte_pfn(ptent) != pfn ||
>>>> + pgprot_val(pte_pgprot(ptent)) != pgprot_val(prot))
>>>> + break;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (pte_dirty(ptent))
>>>> + *any_dirty = true;
>>>> +
>>>> + pfn++;
>>>> + pte++;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + return i;
>>>> }
>>>> /*
>>>> - * Copy one pte. Returns 0 if succeeded, or -EAGAIN if one preallocated page
>>>> - * is required to copy this pte.
>>>> + * Copy set of contiguous ptes. Returns number of ptes copied if succeeded
>>>> + * (always gte 1), or -EAGAIN if one preallocated page is required to copy the
>>>> + * first pte.
>>>> */
>>>> static inline int
>>>> -copy_present_pte(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct
>>>> *src_vma,
>>>> - pte_t *dst_pte, pte_t *src_pte, unsigned long addr, int *rss,
>>>> - struct folio **prealloc)
>>>> +copy_present_ptes(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct
>>>> *src_vma,
>>>> + pte_t *dst_pte, pte_t *src_pte,
>>>> + unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
>>>> + int *rss, struct folio **prealloc)
>>>> {
>>>> struct mm_struct *src_mm = src_vma->vm_mm;
>>>> unsigned long vm_flags = src_vma->vm_flags;
>>>> pte_t pte = ptep_get(src_pte);
>>>> struct page *page;
>>>> struct folio *folio;
>>>> + int nr = 1;
>>>> + bool anon;
>>>> + bool any_dirty = pte_dirty(pte);
>>>> + int i;
>>>> page = vm_normal_page(src_vma, addr, pte);
>>>> - if (page)
>>>> + if (page) {
>>>> folio = page_folio(page);
>>>> - if (page && folio_test_anon(folio)) {
>>>> - /*
>>>> - * If this page may have been pinned by the parent process,
>>>> - * copy the page immediately for the child so that we'll always
>>>> - * guarantee the pinned page won't be randomly replaced in the
>>>> - * future.
>>>> - */
>>>> - folio_get(folio);
>>>> - if (unlikely(page_try_dup_anon_rmap(page, false, src_vma))) {
>>>> - /* Page may be pinned, we have to copy. */
>>>> - folio_put(folio);
>>>> - return copy_present_page(dst_vma, src_vma, dst_pte, src_pte,
>>>> - addr, rss, prealloc, page);
>>>> + anon = folio_test_anon(folio);
>>>> + nr = folio_nr_pages_cont_mapped(folio, page, src_pte, addr,
>>>> + end, pte, &any_dirty);
>>>> +
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < nr; i++, page++) {
>>>> + if (anon) {
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * If this page may have been pinned by the
>>>> + * parent process, copy the page immediately for
>>>> + * the child so that we'll always guarantee the
>>>> + * pinned page won't be randomly replaced in the
>>>> + * future.
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (unlikely(page_try_dup_anon_rmap(
>>>> + page, false, src_vma))) {
>>>> + if (i != 0)
>>>> + break;
>>>> + /* Page may be pinned, we have to copy. */
>>>> + return copy_present_page(
>>>> + dst_vma, src_vma, dst_pte,
>>>> + src_pte, addr, rss, prealloc,
>>>> + page);
>>>> + }
>>>> + rss[MM_ANONPAGES]++;
>>>> + VM_BUG_ON(PageAnonExclusive(page));
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + page_dup_file_rmap(page, false);
>>>> + rss[mm_counter_file(page)]++;
>>>> + }
>>>> }
>>>> - rss[MM_ANONPAGES]++;
>>>> - } else if (page) {
>>>> - folio_get(folio);
>>>> - page_dup_file_rmap(page, false);
>>>> - rss[mm_counter_file(page)]++;
>>>> +
>>>> + nr = i;
>>>> + folio_ref_add(folio, nr);
>>>> }
>>>> /*
>>>> @@ -968,24 +1051,28 @@ copy_present_pte(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct
>>>> vm_area_struct *src_vma,
>>>> * in the parent and the child
>>>> */
>>>> if (is_cow_mapping(vm_flags) && pte_write(pte)) {
>>>> - ptep_set_wrprotect(src_mm, addr, src_pte);
>>>> + ptep_set_wrprotects(src_mm, addr, src_pte, nr);
>>>> pte = pte_wrprotect(pte);
>>>
>>> You likely want an "any_pte_writable" check here instead, no?
>>>
>>> Any operations that target a single indiividual PTE while multiple PTEs are
>>> adjusted are suspicious :)
>>
>> The idea is that I've already constrained the batch of pages such that the
>> permissions are all the same (see folio_nr_pages_cont_mapped()). So if the first
>> pte is writable, then they all are - something has gone badly wrong if some are
>> writable and others are not.
>
> I wonder if it would be cleaner and easier to not do that, though.
>
> Simply record if any pte is writable. Afterwards they will *all* be R/O and you
> can set the cont bit, correct?
Oh I see what you mean - that only works for cow mappings though. If you have a
shared mapping, you won't be making it read-only at fork. So if we ignore
pte_write() state when demarking the batches, we will end up with a batch of
pages with a mix of RO and RW in the parent, but then we set_ptes() for the
child and those pages will all have the permissions of the first page of the batch.
I guess we could special case and do it the way you suggested for cow mappings;
it might be faster, but certainly not cleaner and easier IMHO.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists