linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/244] 5.15.139-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZVYf1VZ1xKQF23Qr@sashalap>
Date:   Thu, 16 Nov 2023 08:57:41 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
        conor@...nel.org, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
        Darren Kenny <darren.kenny@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/244] 5.15.139-rc1 review

On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 04:04:10PM +0530, Harshit Mogalapalli wrote:
>Hi Greg,
>
>On 16/11/23 2:03 am, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.139 release.
>>There are 244 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>let me know.
>>
>>Responses should be made by Fri, 17 Nov 2023 20:34:45 +0000.
>>Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>>The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.139-rc1.gz
>>or in the git tree and branch at:
>>	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
>>and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>
>As Florian pointed:
>
>I am also seeing build failure with perf, which is same as the 
>previous cycle.
>
>BUILDSTDERR: util/evlist.c: In function 'evlist__add_aux_dummy':
>BUILDSTDERR: util/evlist.c:266:31: error: implicit declaration of 
>function 'evlist__dummy_event'; did you mean 'evlist__add_sb_event'? 
>[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>BUILDSTDERR:   266 |         struct evsel *evsel = 
>evlist__dummy_event(evlist);
>BUILDSTDERR:       |                               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>BUILDSTDERR:       |                               evlist__add_sb_event
>BUILDSTDERR: util/evlist.c:266:31: error: initialization of 'struct 
>evsel *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast 
>[-Werror=int-conversion]
>
>I think we should drop:
>3dcc2e4843277 perf evlist: Avoid frequency mode for the dummy event
>4898cce349953 perf tools: Get rid of evlist__add_on_all_cpus()
>a6157c9aa899a perf evlist: Add evlist__add_dummy_on_all_cpus()

Dropped, thanks!

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha