linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drivers/soc/litex: drop obsolete dependency on COMPILE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231116150357.6a2fa8f9@endymion.delvare>
Date:   Thu, 16 Nov 2023 15:03:57 +0100
From:   Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
To:     "Gabriel L. Somlo" <gsomlo@...il.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Karol Gugala <kgugala@...micro.com>,
        Mateusz Holenko <mholenko@...micro.com>,
        Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/soc/litex: drop obsolete dependency on
 COMPILE_TEST

Hi Gabriel,

On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 09:00:02 -0500, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 04:16:18PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Since commit 0166dc11be91 ("of: make CONFIG_OF user selectable"), it
> > is possible to test-build any driver which depends on OF on any
> > architecture by explicitly selecting OF. Therefore depending on
> > COMPILE_TEST as an alternative is no longer needed.
> > 
> > It is actually better to always build such drivers with OF enabled,
> > so that the test builds are closer to how each driver will actually be
> > built on its intended target. Building them without OF may not test
> > much as the compiler will optimize out potentially large parts of the
> > code. In the worst case, this could even pop false positive warnings.
> > Dropping COMPILE_TEST here improves the quality of our testing and
> > avoids wasting time on non-existent issues.
> > 
> > As a minor optimization, this also lets us drop of_match_ptr() and
> > ifdef-guarding, as we now know what they will resolve to, we might as
> > well save cpp some work.  
> 
> Acked-by: Gabriel Somlo <gsomlo@...il.com>

Despite your ack, this patch was never committed. Was it forgotten
somehow? Should I resubmit?

Thanks,
-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support