linux-kernel - Re: [linus:master] [iov_iter] c9eec08bac: vm-scalability.throughput -16.9% regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Nov 2023 16:44:06 +0000
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
        oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev, lkp@...el.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>, ying.huang@...el.com,
        feng.tang@...el.com, fengwei.yin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [iov_iter] c9eec08bac: vm-scalability.throughput -16.9% regression

Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:

> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index ede0bd241056..94d93070d54a 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -996,6 +996,8 @@ endif
>  # change __FILE__ to the relative path from the srctree
>  KBUILD_CPPFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-fmacro-prefix-map=$(srctree)/=)
>  
> +KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= $(call cc-option,-mstringop-strategy=libcall)
> +
>  # include additional Makefiles when needed
>  include-y			:= scripts/Makefile.extrawarn
>  include-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO)	+= scripts/Makefile.debug

If you wanted this patch trying, I get the following numbers:

 iov_kunit_benchmark_bvec: avg 9950 uS, stddev 40 uS
 iov_kunit_benchmark_bvec: avg 9950 uS, stddev 53 uS
 iov_kunit_benchmark_bvec: avg 9973 uS, stddev 69 uS
 iov_kunit_benchmark_bvec_split: avg 9793 uS, stddev 28 uS
 iov_kunit_benchmark_bvec_split: avg 9800 uS, stddev 41 uS
 iov_kunit_benchmark_bvec_split: avg 9804 uS, stddev 16 uS
 iov_kunit_benchmark_kvec: avg 10122 uS, stddev 4403 uS
 iov_kunit_benchmark_kvec: avg 9757 uS, stddev 1516 uS
 iov_kunit_benchmark_kvec: avg 9909 uS, stddev 2694 uS
 iov_kunit_benchmark_xarray: avg 10526 uS, stddev 52 uS
 iov_kunit_benchmark_xarray: avg 10529 uS, stddev 48 uS
 iov_kunit_benchmark_xarray: avg 10532 uS, stddev 63 uS
 iov_kunit_benchmark_xarray_to_bvec: avg 10468 uS, stddev 23 uS
 iov_kunit_benchmark_xarray_to_bvec: avg 10469 uS, stddev 157 uS
 iov_kunit_benchmark_xarray_to_bvec: avg 10471 uS, stddev 163 uS

I'm using the 6 patches here:

	https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/log/?h=iov-kunit

Set CONFIG_TEST_IOV_ITER=m and then load the kunit_iov_iter.ko module.  It'll
dump its benchmarks to dmesg.

David