linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: gpu: samsung: constrain clocks in top-level properties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e9daa8cc-9cdd-4b76-96b9-b9a6b1ef6f5e@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 16 Nov 2023 18:17:31 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc:     Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: gpu: samsung: constrain clocks in
 top-level properties

On 16/11/2023 17:28, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 01:51:30PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 07:44:01PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> When number of clock varies between variants, the Devicetree bindings
>>> coding convention expects to have widest constraints in top-level
>>> definition of the properties and narrow them in allOf:if:then block.
>>>
>>> This is more readable and sometimes allows to spot some errors in the
>>> bindings.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>
>>
>> Åcked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> 
>   ^
> 
> Not an 'A'. I only caught this because I go thru everything 
> Acked/Reviewed-by first and this one was missed.

And in Norwegian it is pronounced as "o", so this would be ocked-by :)

Best regards,
Krzysztof