linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] s390/vfio-ap: a couple of corrections to the IRQ enablement function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <356d1ce0-26e9-474d-8b00-bac4e7421a2b@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Nov 2023 17:49:34 -0500
From:   Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, jjherne@...ux.ibm.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com,
        frankja@...ux.ibm.com, imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com, david@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] s390/vfio-ap: a couple of corrections to the IRQ
 enablement function



On 11/17/23 10:31, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am 15.11.23 um 15:29 schrieb Alexander Gordeev:
>> On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 11:44:19AM -0500, Tony Krowiak wrote:
>>> This series corrects two issues related to enablement of interrupts in
>>> response to interception of the PQAP(AQIC) command:
>> ...
>>
>> Hi Tony!
>>
>> Via which tree this series is to be pulled?
>>
>> Thanks!
> 
> I wanted to create a topic repository/branch for s390-specfic vfio code 
> when we expect conflicts or touch kvm or vfio base code.
> I started that but I have not finished my preparations.
> 
> Given the diffstat:
> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 12 ++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> This looks pretty much isolated to s390, so unless Paolo or Alex complain,
> we should simply carry that via the s390 tree.
> Alexander, can you take those patches?
> Tony, I assume none if the patches is urgent and can wait for the next 
> merge window, correct?

It is not urgent.

> 
> Christian