linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu: re-enable context caching in smmu reset operation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dab82933-4383-4277-9cff-90cba6231b54@quicinc.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Nov 2023 12:45:56 +0530
From:   Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@...cinc.com>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <will@...nel.org>,
        <robin.murphy@....com>, <joro@...tes.org>,
        <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, <a39.skl@...il.com>,
        <quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com>, <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>
CC:     <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <qipl.kernel.upstream@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu: re-enable context caching in smmu
 reset operation



On 11/15/2023 10:13 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/14/23 14:56, Bibek Kumar Patro wrote:
>> Context caching is re-enabled in the prefetch buffer for Qualcomm SoCs
>> through SoC specific reset ops, which is disabled in the default MMU-500
>> reset ops, but is expected for context banks using ACTLR register to
>> retain the prefetch value during reset and runtime suspend.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@...cinc.com>
>> ---
> And I assume that goes for all SMMU500 implementations?
> 

Right, for all SMMU500 implementation for Qualcomm SoCs.
Hence implemented this enablement with Qualcomm specific reset operation.

> Looking at the 8550 ACTRL array from patch 2, CPRE is not enabled
> at all times.. Is that because of performance, or some other
> technical reason?
> 
> Will this regress platforms without ACTRL tables?
> 

It should not regress, If you check my recent reply on Dimitry's
response, the Corelink revision is r2p4 and it can be enabled.
On the Robin's mentioned errata workarounds, let me check once.

Thanks & regards,
Bibek

> Konrad