linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v17 059/116] KVM: TDX: Create initial guest memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231117000458.GB1277973@ls.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Nov 2023 16:04:58 -0800
From:   Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     isaku.yamahata@...el.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, isaku.yamahata@...il.com,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, erdemaktas@...gle.com,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Sagi Shahar <sagis@...gle.com>,
        David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
        Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>,
        Zhi Wang <zhi.wang.linux@...il.com>, chen.bo@...el.com,
        hang.yuan@...el.com, tina.zhang@...el.com, gkirkpatrick@...gle.com,
        isaku.yamahata@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 059/116] KVM: TDX: Create initial guest memory

On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 02:35:33PM +0800,
Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 11/7/2023 10:56 PM, isaku.yamahata@...el.com wrote:
> > From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
> > 
> > Because the guest memory is protected in TDX, the creation of the initial
> > guest memory requires a dedicated TDX module API, tdh_mem_page_add, instead
> > of directly copying the memory contents into the guest memory in the case
> > of the default VM type.  KVM MMU page fault handler callback,
> > private_page_add, handles it.
> > 
> > Define new subcommand, KVM_TDX_INIT_MEM_REGION, of VM-scoped
> > KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_OP.  It assigns the guest page, copies the initial
> > memory contents into the guest memory, encrypts the guest memory.  At the
> > same time, optionally it extends memory measurement of the TDX guest.  It
> > calls the KVM MMU page fault(EPT-violation) handler to trigger the
> > callbacks for it.
> > 
> > Reported-by: gkirkpatrick@...gle.com
> > Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
> > 
> > ---
> > v15 -> v16:
> > - add check if nr_pages isn't large with
> >    (nr_page << PAGE_SHIFT) >> PAGE_SHIFT
> > 
> > v14 -> v15:
> > - add a check if TD is finalized or not to tdx_init_mem_region()
> > - return -EAGAIN when partial population
> > ---
> >   arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h       |   9 ++
> >   arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c                |   1 +
> >   arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c                | 167 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >   arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.h                |   2 +
> >   tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h |   9 ++
> >   5 files changed, 185 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> [...]
> > +static int tdx_sept_page_add(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn,
> > +			     enum pg_level level, kvm_pfn_t pfn)
> 
> For me, the function name is a bit confusing.
> I would relate it to a SEPT table page instead of a normal private page if
> only by the function name.
> 
> Similar to tdx_sept_page_aug(), though it's less confusing due to there is
> no seam call to aug a sept table page.

How about tdx_mem_page_{add, aug}()?
-- 
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...ux.intel.com>