linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -tip] x86/mm: Use %RIP-relative address in untagged

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231117104502.4p53qqldwmyuyqju@box.shutemov.name>
Date:   Fri, 17 Nov 2023 13:45:02 +0300
From:   kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86/mm: Use %RIP-relative address in untagged_addr()

On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 10:41:03AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 08:10:59PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > %RIP-relative addresses are nowadays correctly handled in alternative
> > instructions, so remove misleading comment and improve assembly to
> > use %RIP-relative address.
> 
> Ha!, it might've been this exact case (and Kirill grumbling) that got me
> to fix the alternative code :-)

Nice! :)

> > Also, explicitly using %gs: prefix will segfault for non-SMP builds.
> > Use macros from percpu.h which will DTRT with segment prefix register
> > as far as SMP/non-SMP builds are concerned.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
> 
> Acked-byL Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radaed.org>

Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>

-- 
  Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov