[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZVdE6nqanqcaL8sO@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 11:48:10 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Nirmal Patel <nirmal.patel@...ux.intel.com>,
Jonathan Derrick <jonathan.derrick@...ux.dev>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] PCI: qcom: Clean up ASPM comment
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 04:02:27PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 02:55:51PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > Break up the newly added ASPM comment so that it fits within the soft 80
> > character limit and becomes more readable.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
>
> I think we discussed (80column soft limit for comments) in the past, but I don't
> think breaking here makes the comment more readable.
The coding style clearly states:
The preferred limit on the length of a single line is 80 columns.
Statements longer than 80 columns should be broken into sensible chunks,
unless exceeding 80 columns significantly increases readability and does
not hide information.
Going beyond 80 chars may sometimes be warranted for code, but the
exception is not intended for comments.
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists