linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] PCI: qcom: Clean up ASPM comment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231117105404.GR250770@thinkpad>
Date:   Fri, 17 Nov 2023 16:24:04 +0530
From:   Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
To:     Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc:     Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Nirmal Patel <nirmal.patel@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jonathan Derrick <jonathan.derrick@...ux.dev>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] PCI: qcom: Clean up ASPM comment

On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 11:48:10AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 04:02:27PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 02:55:51PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > Break up the newly added ASPM comment so that it fits within the soft 80
> > > character limit and becomes more readable.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
> > 
> > I think we discussed (80column soft limit for comments) in the past, but I don't
> > think breaking here makes the comment more readable.
> 
> The coding style clearly states:
> 
> 	The preferred limit on the length of a single line is 80 columns.
> 
> 	Statements longer than 80 columns should be broken into sensible chunks,
> 	unless exceeding 80 columns significantly increases readability and does
> 	not hide information.
> 
> Going beyond 80 chars may sometimes be warranted for code, but the
> exception is not intended for comments.
> 

Breaking the comment here is indeed making it hard to read. It's just one word
that needs to be broken if we go by 80 column limit and I won't prefer that,
sorry!

- Mani

> Johan

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்