linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: scmi: process the result of devm_of_clk_add_hw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fe85f03b-1c2a-3a99-c62b-abdf7e1eccb4@astralinux.ru>
Date:   Fri, 17 Nov 2023 14:14:13 +0300
From:   Александра Дюпина 
        <adiupina@...ralinux.ru>
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc:     Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lvc-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: scmi: process the result of
 devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider()

I'm sorry, I forgot to add "return ret;" after
calling the dev_err() function. Before I post
the second version of the patch, please let me
know what you think about this fix, keeping in
mind what I wanted to add "return ret;"

17.11.2023 10:49, Alexandra Diupina пишет:
> devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider() may return an errno, so
> add a return value check
> 
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
> 
> Fixes: 8410e7f3b31e ("cpufreq: scmi: Fix OPP addition failure with a dummy clock provider")
> Signed-off-by: Alexandra Diupina <adiupina@...ralinux.ru>
> ---
>   drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 9 +++++++--
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
> index c8a7ccc42c16..4037945663bf 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -334,8 +334,13 @@ static int scmi_cpufreq_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)
>   
>   #ifdef CONFIG_COMMON_CLK
>   	/* dummy clock provider as needed by OPP if clocks property is used */
> -	if (of_property_present(dev->of_node, "#clock-cells"))
> -		devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider(dev, of_clk_hw_simple_get, NULL);
> +	if (of_property_present(dev->of_node, "#clock-cells")) {
> +		ret = devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider(dev, of_clk_hw_simple_get, NULL);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "%s: registering clock provider failed, err: %d\n",
> +				__func__, ret);
> +		}
> +	}
>   #endif
>   
>   	ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&scmi_cpufreq_driver);


Regards,

Alexandra Diupina